vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACADIA REALTY TRUST (AKR) and AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $103.0M, roughly 1.0× ACADIA REALTY TRUST). ACADIA REALTY TRUST runs the higher net margin — 135.1% vs -55.2%, a 190.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -1.3%). Over the past eight quarters, ACADIA REALTY TRUST's revenue compounded faster (7.0% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Acadia Realty Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that specializes in owning, operating, and redeveloping high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily in dense, high-barrier-to-entry U.S. markets. Its portfolio includes neighborhood shopping centers, urban street retail assets, and community-focused mixed-use developments.
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
AKR vs AP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $103.0M | $104.4M |
| Net Profit | $139.1M | $-57.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 153.9% | -54.0% |
| Net Margin | 135.1% | -55.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.3% | 11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -58.2% | -1958.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-2.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $103.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $103.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $108.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $99.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.3M | $93.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $92.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.3M | $107.1M |
| Q1 26 | $139.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-57.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.3M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $2.0M |
| Q1 26 | 153.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -54.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | 4.7% |
| Q1 26 | 135.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.4M | $10.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $117.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $32.6M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $495.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8M | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.2M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $7.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $117.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $115.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $115.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $116.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $119.4M |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $58.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $58.0M |
| Q1 26 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $495.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $524.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $537.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $536.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $530.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $547.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $560.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.82× | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.95× | 2.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-64.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -0.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-8.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.4M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.6M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.0M | $-5.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-64.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-8.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -7.5% |
| Q1 26 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | 121.08× | 2.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.25× | -2.64× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AKR
| Rental | $98.6M | 96% |
| Other | $4.4M | 4% |
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
