vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACADIA REALTY TRUST (AKR) and Cytek Biosciences, Inc. (CTKB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ACADIA REALTY TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($103.0M vs $62.1M, roughly 1.7× Cytek Biosciences, Inc.). ACADIA REALTY TRUST runs the higher net margin — 135.1% vs -70.9%, a 206.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cytek Biosciences, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs -1.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Cytek Biosciences, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (17.7% CAGR vs 7.0%).
Acadia Realty Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that specializes in owning, operating, and redeveloping high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily in dense, high-barrier-to-entry U.S. markets. Its portfolio includes neighborhood shopping centers, urban street retail assets, and community-focused mixed-use developments.
Cytek Biosciences, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-performance flow cytometry systems, associated reagents and analysis software. Its solutions serve life science research, clinical diagnostics and biopharmaceutical sectors, with a global customer base across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.
AKR vs CTKB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $103.0M | $62.1M |
| Net Profit | $139.1M | $-44.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.9% |
| Operating Margin | 153.9% | -9.0% |
| Net Margin | 135.1% | -70.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.3% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -58.2% | -557.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $103.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $62.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $52.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $45.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $41.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.3M | $57.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.3M | $46.6M |
| Q1 26 | $139.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-44.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $9.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.3M | $941.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $-10.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 52.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 58.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 56.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 54.6% |
| Q1 26 | 153.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -23.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -36.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | -8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | -18.3% |
| Q1 26 | 135.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -70.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -27.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | -22.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.4M | $90.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $341.7M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $461.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $90.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $93.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $75.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $95.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8M | $98.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.2M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $177.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $341.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $378.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $377.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $379.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $395.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $385.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $389.1M |
| Q1 26 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $461.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $494.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $493.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $482.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $499.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $491.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $483.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.95× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-771.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -2.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-8.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-771.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $108.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-125.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.4M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.6M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.0M | $6.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-974.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 121.08× | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.64× | 14.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.25× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AKR
| Rental | $98.6M | 96% |
| Other | $4.4M | 4% |
CTKB
| Products | $46.6M | 75% |
| Services | $15.5M | 25% |
