vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACADIA REALTY TRUST (AKR) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ACADIA REALTY TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($103.0M vs $93.7M, roughly 1.1× Ranpak Holdings Corp.). On growth, Ranpak Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.3% vs -1.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Ranpak Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 7.0%).
Acadia Realty Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that specializes in owning, operating, and redeveloping high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily in dense, high-barrier-to-entry U.S. markets. Its portfolio includes neighborhood shopping centers, urban street retail assets, and community-focused mixed-use developments.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
AKR vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $103.0M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | $139.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 153.9% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 135.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -1.3% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -58.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $103.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.3M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.3M | $72.8M |
| Q1 26 | $139.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.3M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $5.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.5% |
| Q1 26 | 153.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | -7.1% |
| Q1 26 | 135.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.0% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.4M | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8M | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.2M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $65.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $396.1M |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $566.2M |
| Q1 26 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.82× | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.95× | 0.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.4M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.6M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.0M | $19.6M |
| Q1 26 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 121.08× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.25× | 3.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AKR
| Rental | $98.6M | 96% |
| Other | $4.4M | 4% |
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
