vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACADIA REALTY TRUST (AKR) and PAMT CORP (PAMT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PAMT CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($141.3M vs $103.0M, roughly 1.4× ACADIA REALTY TRUST). ACADIA REALTY TRUST runs the higher net margin — 135.1% vs -20.7%, a 155.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ACADIA REALTY TRUST posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.3% vs -15.1%). Over the past eight quarters, ACADIA REALTY TRUST's revenue compounded faster (7.0% CAGR vs -12.0%).
Acadia Realty Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that specializes in owning, operating, and redeveloping high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily in dense, high-barrier-to-entry U.S. markets. Its portfolio includes neighborhood shopping centers, urban street retail assets, and community-focused mixed-use developments.
AKR vs PAMT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $103.0M | $141.3M |
| Net Profit | $139.1M | $-29.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 153.9% | -27.0% |
| Net Margin | 135.1% | -20.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.3% | -15.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -58.2% | 7.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-1.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $103.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $141.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $150.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $151.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $155.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.3M | $166.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $182.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.3M | $182.9M |
| Q1 26 | $139.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-29.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-5.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-9.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $-31.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $-2.9M |
| Q1 26 | 153.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -27.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | -22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | -0.4% |
| Q1 26 | 135.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | -19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | -1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $-1.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.4M | $83.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $333.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $210.5M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $697.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $117.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $102.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8M | $110.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.2M | $92.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $114.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $333.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $325.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $210.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $239.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $244.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $269.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $277.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $308.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $306.7M |
| Q1 26 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $697.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $715.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $707.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $712.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $741.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $756.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $733.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 1.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.95× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-25.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -17.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 13.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-23.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.4M | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.6M | $15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.0M | $18.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-25.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-39.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-33.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -18.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 121.08× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.64× | 6.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.25× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AKR
| Rental | $98.6M | 96% |
| Other | $4.4M | 4% |
PAMT
| Freight Transportation Service | $123.1M | 87% |
| Fuel Surcharge | $18.2M | 13% |
