vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACADIA REALTY TRUST (AKR) and POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. (PSIX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($191.2M vs $103.0M, roughly 1.9× ACADIA REALTY TRUST). ACADIA REALTY TRUST runs the higher net margin — 135.1% vs 8.4%, a 126.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.5% vs -1.3%). Over the past eight quarters, POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (41.7% CAGR vs 7.0%).
Acadia Realty Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that specializes in owning, operating, and redeveloping high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily in dense, high-barrier-to-entry U.S. markets. Its portfolio includes neighborhood shopping centers, urban street retail assets, and community-focused mixed-use developments.
Adani Energy Solutions Ltd, formerly known as Adani Transmission Ltd, is an electric power transmission and distribution company headquartered in Ahmedabad. As of April 2025, the company operates a cumulative transmission network of 26,696 circuit kilometers and is one of the largest private sector power transmission companies operating in India.
AKR vs PSIX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $103.0M | $191.2M |
| Net Profit | $139.1M | $16.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 21.9% |
| Operating Margin | 153.9% | 12.7% |
| Net Margin | 135.1% | 8.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.3% | 32.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -58.2% | -31.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $103.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $191.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $203.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $191.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $135.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.3M | $144.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $125.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.3M | $110.6M |
| Q1 26 | $139.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $16.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $51.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.3M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $21.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.8% |
| Q1 26 | 153.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | 22.9% |
| Q1 26 | 135.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.0% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 19.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.83 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $1.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $0.94 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.4M | $41.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $96.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $178.6M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $424.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.54× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $41.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8M | $55.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.2M | $40.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $28.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $96.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $96.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $184.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $238.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $292.0K |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $178.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $162.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $135.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $84.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $65.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $42.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $24.8M |
| Q1 26 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $424.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $458.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $437.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $372.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $328.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $339.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $307.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.82× | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.95× | 0.01× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-4.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-7.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -4.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $14.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.4M | $32.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.6M | $12.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.0M | $1.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $822.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -0.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 121.08× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.64× | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.25× | 0.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AKR
| Rental | $98.6M | 96% |
| Other | $4.4M | 4% |
PSIX
| Energy End Market | $153.4M | 80% |
| Industrial End Market | $33.3M | 17% |
| Transportation End Market | $4.6M | 2% |
