vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACADIA REALTY TRUST (AKR) and RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS INC (RIGL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ACADIA REALTY TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($103.0M vs $69.8M, roughly 1.5× RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS INC). RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS INC runs the higher net margin — 384.0% vs 135.1%, a 249.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.2% vs -1.3%). Over the past eight quarters, RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS INC's revenue compounded faster (53.7% CAGR vs 7.0%).
Acadia Realty Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that specializes in owning, operating, and redeveloping high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily in dense, high-barrier-to-entry U.S. markets. Its portfolio includes neighborhood shopping centers, urban street retail assets, and community-focused mixed-use developments.
Rigel Pharmaceuticals Inc is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing and commercializing targeted small molecule therapies for autoimmune, inflammatory, and hematologic diseases. Its approved flagship product treats adult immune thrombocytopenia, with primary operations and core markets in the United States, addressing unmet medical needs for underserved patient groups.
AKR vs RIGL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $103.0M | $69.8M |
| Net Profit | $139.1M | $268.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 91.5% |
| Operating Margin | 153.9% | 33.2% |
| Net Margin | 135.1% | 384.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.3% | 21.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -58.2% | 1769.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $14.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $103.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $69.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $101.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $53.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.3M | $57.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $55.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.3M | $36.8M |
| Q1 26 | $139.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $59.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.3M | $12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $-1.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 91.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 93.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 95.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 91.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 89.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 85.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 92.4% |
| Q1 26 | 153.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 33.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 25.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | 135.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 384.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 58.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.0% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | -2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $14.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.28 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.63 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $0.82 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.4M | $155.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $52.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $391.5M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $513.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $155.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $137.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $108.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $77.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8M | $77.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.2M | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $49.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $52.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $60.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $60.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $391.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $117.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $81.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $-14.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $-29.9M |
| Q1 26 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $513.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $242.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $206.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $176.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $164.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $139.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $128.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.23× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 18.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.95× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $22.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.08× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-893.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.4M | $14.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.6M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.0M | $302.0K |
| Q1 26 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.08× | ||
| Q4 24 | 121.08× | 1.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.64× | 1.75× | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.25× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AKR
| Rental | $98.6M | 96% |
| Other | $4.4M | 4% |
RIGL
Segment breakdown not available.
