vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and CLEANSPARK, INC. (CLSK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Astera Labs, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($308.4M vs $181.2M, roughly 1.7× CLEANSPARK, INC.). Astera Labs, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 26.0% vs -209.0%, a 235.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Astera Labs, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (93.4% vs 11.6%). Over the past eight quarters, CLEANSPARK, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (106.4% CAGR vs 100.3%).
Astera Labs, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor manufacturer and artificial intelligence company. The company specializes in designing high-speed connectivity solutions for data centers and AI infrastructure. The company has been listed on the Nasdaq since March 2024.
CleanSpark, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered sustainable technology company operating two core business segments: low-carbon Bitcoin mining powered primarily by renewable and stranded energy resources, and end-to-end microgrid design, deployment, and operation services for commercial, industrial, and public sector clients across North America.
ALAB vs CLSK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $308.4M | $181.2M |
| Net Profit | $80.3M | $-378.7M |
| Gross Margin | 76.3% | 47.2% |
| Operating Margin | 20.1% | -174.7% |
| Net Margin | 26.0% | -209.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 93.4% | 11.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 152.4% | -253.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $308.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $270.6M | $181.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $230.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $141.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $113.1M | $89.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.8M | $104.1M |
| Q1 26 | $80.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $-378.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.6M | $-62.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.5M | $-236.2M |
| Q1 26 | 76.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 75.6% | 47.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 76.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 75.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.7% | 36.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.9% | 56.6% |
| Q1 26 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.7% | -174.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.9% | -73.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -31.7% | -239.2% |
| Q1 26 | 26.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.6% | -209.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.7% | -69.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.8% | -226.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $148.3M | $458.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.29× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $148.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $167.6M | $458.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $162.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $126.1M | $121.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $421.1M | $126.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3M |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $964.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $889.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $845.3M | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $983.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $915.5M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $74.6M | $-161.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-198.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -109.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 20.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.93× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-626.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $74.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $95.3M | $-161.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.5M | $-233.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.8M | $-58.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $76.6M | $-198.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.8M | $-299.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.5M | $-68.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.3% | -109.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.4% | -335.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.1% | -66.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 74.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 9.9% |
| Q1 26 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.12× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
