vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Astera Labs, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.6M vs $268.0M, roughly 1.0× Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd). Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — 30.8% vs 16.6%, a 14.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (272.1% vs 91.8%). Astera Labs, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($76.6M vs $38.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd's revenue compounded faster (110.0% CAGR vs 103.6%).
Astera Labs, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor manufacturer and artificial intelligence company. The company specializes in designing high-speed connectivity solutions for data centers and AI infrastructure. The company has been listed on the Nasdaq since March 2024.
Seiko Group is a corporate group composed of Seiko Group Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates. It used to be recognized as a corporate group consisting of three core companies Seiko Holdings Corp., Seiko Instruments Inc., and Seiko Epson Corp. The three companies were linked by a common thread of timepiece technology. Although Epson still develops and manufactures wristwatches for the Seiko Group, Epson and its subsidiaries are not considered part of the group.
ALAB vs CRDO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.6M | $268.0M |
| Net Profit | $45.0M | $82.6M |
| Gross Margin | 75.6% | 67.5% |
| Operating Margin | 24.7% | 29.4% |
| Net Margin | 16.6% | 30.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 91.8% | 272.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 82.0% | 2055.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.25 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $270.6M | $268.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $230.6M | $223.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.9M | $170.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.4M | $135.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $141.1M | $72.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $113.1M | $59.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.8M | $60.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $65.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $82.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.1M | $63.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.2M | $36.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.8M | $29.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.7M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.6M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.5M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-93.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 75.6% | 67.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 76.2% | 67.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 75.8% | 67.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.9% | 63.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.0% | 63.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.7% | 62.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.9% | 65.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 77.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 24.7% | 29.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.0% | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.7% | 19.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | -11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.9% | -24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -31.7% | -13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -127.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.6% | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.5% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.7% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.7% | -16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.8% | -17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -142.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.25 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.29 | $0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.18 | $0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.77 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $167.6M | $813.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $167.6M | $813.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.4M | $479.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $162.3M | $431.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.4M | $379.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | $383.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $126.1M | $398.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $421.1M | $410.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $696.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $781.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $681.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $618.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $964.8M | $567.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $889.6M | $553.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $845.3M | $540.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $808.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $905.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $809.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $719.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $638.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $983.1M | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $915.5M | $601.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $864.9M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $95.3M | $61.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $76.6M | $38.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 28.3% | 14.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 8.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.12× | 0.75× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $281.8M | $143.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $95.3M | $61.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.2M | $54.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.4M | $57.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.7M | $10.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.5M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.8M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $76.6M | $38.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.3M | $54.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.3M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.8M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.5M | $962.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $228.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 28.3% | 14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.6% | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.5% | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.2% | -16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.4% | -21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.12× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.86× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.64× | 1.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
