vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and ENTEGRIS INC (ENTG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $823.9M, roughly 1.7× ENTEGRIS INC). ENTEGRIS INC runs the higher net margin — 6.0% vs -29.0%, a 35.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs -3.1%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $134.0M). Over the past eight quarters, ENTEGRIS INC's revenue compounded faster (3.4% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Entegris, Inc. is a supplier of materials for the semiconductor and other high-tech industries. Entegris has approximately 8,000 employees throughout its global operations. It has manufacturing, customer service and/or research facilities in the United States, Canada, China, Germany, Israel, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan. The company’s corporate headquarters are in Billerica, Massachusetts.
ALB vs ENTG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $823.9M |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $49.4M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 43.8% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 12.7% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 6.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | -3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | -51.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $0.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $823.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $807.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $792.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $773.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $849.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $807.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $812.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $771.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $49.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $70.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $52.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $62.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $102.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $77.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $67.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $45.3M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 44.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 46.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 45.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 46.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 45.6% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 15.3% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 5.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.41 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.67 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $0.51 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $360.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $4.0B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $8.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 0.94× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $360.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $399.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $376.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $340.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $329.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $432.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $320.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $340.7M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $8.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $8.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | 0.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | 1.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | 1.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | 1.22× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $192.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $134.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | 16.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 7.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.89× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $396.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $192.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $249.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $113.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $140.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $176.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $197.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $111.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $147.2M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $182.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $47.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $32.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $68.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $115.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $51.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $80.6M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | 10.4% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.89× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 2.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 2.23× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 3.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
ENTG
| Fabs | $516.3M | 63% |
| Equipment And Engineering | $121.8M | 15% |
| Chemical And Materials | $83.8M | 10% |
| Other | $61.7M | 7% |
| Non Semi | $40.3M | 5% |
