vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC (IIIN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $159.9M, roughly 8.9× INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC). INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 4.7% vs -29.0%, a 33.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.3% vs 15.9%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $-2.2M). Over the past eight quarters, INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Insteel Industries Inc is a leading U.S. manufacturer of steel reinforcing products including welded wire reinforcement and steel fibers. It primarily serves non-residential construction, infrastructure, and precast concrete segments across North America, delivering high-performance reinforcement solutions for various construction projects.
ALB vs IIIN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $159.9M |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $7.6M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 11.3% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 6.0% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 4.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 23.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | 602.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $159.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $177.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $179.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $160.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $134.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $145.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $127.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $15.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $6.9M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 12.3% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 8.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 5.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $0.74 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.52 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $15.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $358.8M |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $456.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $38.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $53.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $28.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $36.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $111.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $97.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $83.9M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $358.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $371.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $356.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $341.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $331.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $350.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $346.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $340.6M |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $456.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $462.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $471.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $421.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $404.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $422.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $414.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $397.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $-701.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $-2.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | -1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $439.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $-701.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $28.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $18.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $-18.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $26.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $-580.0K |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | -1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | -10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | -3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | -0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 1.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | -0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 17.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 0.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
IIIN
| Welded Wire Reinforcement | $108.4M | 68% |
| PC Strand | $51.6M | 32% |
