vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. (ITP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $25.6M, roughly 55.8× IT TECH PACKAGING, INC.). IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. runs the higher net margin — -5.7% vs -29.0%, a 23.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 2.1%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $1.5M). Over the past eight quarters, IT TECH PACKAGING, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is a paper manufacturing enterprise primarily operating in China. It produces and distributes a diverse portfolio of paper products including corrugated packaging paper, boxboard, and printing-use cultural paper, serving sectors such as consumer goods packaging, logistics, and commercial printing across its core market.
ALB vs ITP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $25.6M |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 7.9% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | -3.9% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | -5.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | 26.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $26.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $6.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $-77.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $-3.7M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | -31.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | -21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | -51.0% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | -7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | -32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | -22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | -54.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $4.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $152.0M |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $175.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $11.4M |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $152.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $152.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $152.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $156.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $164.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $163.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $164.3M |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $175.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $175.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $175.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $177.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $190.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $191.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $177.5M |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 0.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | 0.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $1.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | 5.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $3.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $721.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $624.4K |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $668.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $615.4K |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | -22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | 9.0% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
ITP
Segment breakdown not available.
