vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Legacy Housing Corp (LEGH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $25.5M, roughly 56.1× Legacy Housing Corp). Legacy Housing Corp runs the higher net margin — 32.2% vs -29.0%, a 61.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs -30.6%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $15.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Albemarle Corporation's revenue compounded faster (2.4% CAGR vs -9.1%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Legacy Housing Corp is a prominent U.S.-based manufacturer of affordable manufactured homes, tiny homes, and accessory dwelling units. It mainly caters to low- and middle-income consumers across North America, providing customizable residential solutions, supporting construction materials, and after-sales services for individual and community development clients.
ALB vs LEGH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $25.5M |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $8.2M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 26.4% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 40.4% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 32.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | -30.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | -43.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $25.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $28.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $24.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $36.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $31.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $30.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $10.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $14.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $15.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $16.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $15.1M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 20.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 32.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 29.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 27.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 33.6% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 40.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 47.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 54.3% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 32.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 30.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 38.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 42.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 39.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 52.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 51.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 49.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.41 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $0.64 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $8.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $528.6M |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $580.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $570.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $60.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $621.0K |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $528.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $521.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $512.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $503.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $494.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $479.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $463.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $450.4M |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $580.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $557.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $552.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $544.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $534.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $521.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $514.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $510.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $19.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $15.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | 61.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 13.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.32× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $28.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 61.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 30.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | 32.2% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 0.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
LEGH
| Commercial Sales | $8.6M | 34% |
| Retail Store Sales | $6.0M | 24% |
| Inventory Finance Sales | $5.0M | 20% |
| Direct Sales | $4.4M | 17% |
| Other | $1.5M | 6% |
