vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and SEALED AIR CORP (SEE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.0× SEALED AIR CORP). SEALED AIR CORP runs the higher net margin — 3.1% vs -29.0%, a 32.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 2.6%). SEALED AIR CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($257.7M vs $233.1M). Over the past eight quarters, SEALED AIR CORP's revenue compounded faster (2.7% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Sealed Air Corporation is a global provider of innovative packaging and protective solutions. Its core offerings include cushioning materials, food safety and preservation packaging, and sustainable waste-reducing packaging systems, serving retail, e-commerce, food and beverage, and industrial manufacturing markets worldwide.
ALB vs SEE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $43.8M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 28.6% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 11.4% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 3.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | 700.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $255.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $93.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $113.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $91.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $98.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $82.0M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 30.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 30.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 31.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 30.3% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 14.0% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $1.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $0.63 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $344.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $3.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $7.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 2.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $344.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $282.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $354.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $335.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $371.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $386.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $388.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $352.8M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $4.5B |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $953.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $797.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $624.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $771.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $650.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $598.3M |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $7.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $7.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | 2.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | 3.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 4.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | 5.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 6.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | 5.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | 6.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | 7.49× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $293.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $257.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | 18.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 2.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $458.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $293.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $165.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $136.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $31.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $244.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $170.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $188.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $125.1M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $257.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $93.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $185.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $115.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $78.0M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | 5.9% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 0.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.91× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | 1.53× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
SEE
| Protective Segment | $1.1B | 78% |
| Other | $292.0M | 21% |
| Pension Plans Defined Benefit | $7.9M | 1% |
