vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and TKO Group Holdings (TKO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.4× TKO Group Holdings). Albemarle Corporation runs the higher net margin — 22.3% vs -0.2%, a 22.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TKO Group Holdings posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (61.6% vs 32.7%). Over the past eight quarters, TKO Group Holdings's revenue compounded faster (28.4% CAGR vs -0.1%).

Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...

TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) is an American sports and sports entertainment company. Established on September 12, 2023, the public company was formed by a merger between Endeavor subsidiary Zuffa—the parent company of the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), a mixed martial arts promotion—and the professional wrestling promotion World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE).

ALB vs TKO — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ALB
ALB
1.4× larger
ALB
$1.4B
$1.0B
TKO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TKO
TKO
+29.0% gap
TKO
61.6%
32.7%
ALB
Higher net margin
ALB
ALB
22.6% more per $
ALB
22.3%
-0.2%
TKO
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TKO
TKO
Annualised
TKO
28.4%
-0.1%
ALB

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
ALB
ALB
TKO
TKO
Revenue
$1.4B
$1.0B
Net Profit
$319.1M
$-2.4M
Gross Margin
35.1%
Operating Margin
16.3%
5.5%
Net Margin
22.3%
-0.2%
Revenue YoY
32.7%
61.6%
Net Profit YoY
671.7%
-107.7%
EPS (diluted)
$2.34
$-0.07

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ALB
ALB
TKO
TKO
Q1 26
$1.4B
Q4 25
$1.4B
$1.0B
Q3 25
$1.3B
$1.1B
Q2 25
$1.3B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.1B
$1.3B
Q4 24
$1.2B
$642.2M
Q3 24
$1.4B
$681.3M
Q2 24
$1.4B
$851.2M
Net Profit
ALB
ALB
TKO
TKO
Q1 26
$319.1M
Q4 25
$-414.2M
$-2.4M
Q3 25
$-160.7M
$41.0M
Q2 25
$22.9M
$98.4M
Q1 25
$41.3M
$58.4M
Q4 24
$75.3M
$31.0M
Q3 24
$-1.1B
$23.1M
Q2 24
$-188.2M
$59.1M
Gross Margin
ALB
ALB
TKO
TKO
Q1 26
35.1%
Q4 25
13.9%
Q3 25
9.0%
Q2 25
14.8%
Q1 25
14.5%
Q4 24
11.2%
Q3 24
-7.7%
Q2 24
-0.7%
Operating Margin
ALB
ALB
TKO
TKO
Q1 26
16.3%
Q4 25
-15.2%
5.5%
Q3 25
-16.6%
15.4%
Q2 25
3.6%
28.1%
Q1 25
1.8%
18.7%
Q4 24
0.4%
15.9%
Q3 24
-81.9%
20.0%
Q2 24
-34.4%
30.0%
Net Margin
ALB
ALB
TKO
TKO
Q1 26
22.3%
Q4 25
-29.0%
-0.2%
Q3 25
-12.3%
3.7%
Q2 25
1.7%
7.5%
Q1 25
3.8%
4.6%
Q4 24
6.1%
4.8%
Q3 24
-78.9%
3.4%
Q2 24
-13.2%
6.9%
EPS (diluted)
ALB
ALB
TKO
TKO
Q1 26
$2.34
Q4 25
$-3.88
$-0.07
Q3 25
$-1.72
$0.47
Q2 25
$-0.16
$1.17
Q1 25
$0.00
$0.69
Q4 24
$0.29
$0.28
Q3 24
$-9.45
$0.28
Q2 24
$-1.96
$0.72

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ALB
ALB
TKO
TKO
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.1B
$831.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.9B
$3.8B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.1B
$3.7B
Total Assets
$15.1B
$15.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.19×
1.01×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ALB
ALB
TKO
TKO
Q1 26
$1.1B
Q4 25
$831.1M
Q3 25
$1.9B
$861.4M
Q2 25
$1.8B
$535.1M
Q1 25
$1.5B
$470.9M
Q4 24
$1.2B
$525.6M
Q3 24
$1.7B
$457.4M
Q2 24
$1.8B
$277.5M
Total Debt
ALB
ALB
TKO
TKO
Q1 26
$1.9B
Q4 25
$3.2B
$3.8B
Q3 25
$3.6B
$3.7B
Q2 25
$3.6B
$2.7B
Q1 25
$3.5B
$2.8B
Q4 24
$3.5B
$2.8B
Q3 24
$3.6B
$2.7B
Q2 24
$3.5B
$2.7B
Stockholders' Equity
ALB
ALB
TKO
TKO
Q1 26
$10.1B
Q4 25
$9.5B
$3.7B
Q3 25
$10.0B
$3.8B
Q2 25
$10.2B
$4.3B
Q1 25
$10.0B
$4.2B
Q4 24
$10.0B
$4.1B
Q3 24
$10.2B
$4.0B
Q2 24
$11.2B
$4.0B
Total Assets
ALB
ALB
TKO
TKO
Q1 26
$15.1B
Q4 25
$16.4B
$15.5B
Q3 25
$17.1B
$15.5B
Q2 25
$17.3B
$15.3B
Q1 25
$17.0B
$15.0B
Q4 24
$16.6B
$12.7B
Q3 24
$17.5B
$12.8B
Q2 24
$18.4B
$12.7B
Debt / Equity
ALB
ALB
TKO
TKO
Q1 26
0.19×
Q4 25
0.33×
1.01×
Q3 25
0.36×
0.98×
Q2 25
0.35×
0.64×
Q1 25
0.35×
0.66×
Q4 24
0.35×
0.67×
Q3 24
0.35×
0.67×
Q2 24
0.31×
0.68×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ALB
ALB
TKO
TKO
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$346.2M
$309.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$247.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
17.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
6.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.09×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$577.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ALB
ALB
TKO
TKO
Q1 26
$346.2M
Q4 25
$388.5M
$309.9M
Q3 25
$355.6M
$416.8M
Q2 25
$-7.2M
$396.2M
Q1 25
$545.4M
$162.8M
Q4 24
$674.0K
$56.8M
Q3 24
$240.5M
$236.5M
Q2 24
$362.9M
$230.7M
Free Cash Flow
ALB
ALB
TKO
TKO
Q1 26
$247.6M
Q4 25
$233.1M
Q3 25
$223.4M
Q2 25
$-126.8M
Q1 25
$362.8M
Q4 24
$-355.1M
Q3 24
$-62.6M
Q2 24
$-84.7M
FCF Margin
ALB
ALB
TKO
TKO
Q1 26
17.3%
Q4 25
16.3%
Q3 25
17.1%
Q2 25
-9.5%
Q1 25
33.7%
Q4 24
-28.8%
Q3 24
-4.6%
Q2 24
-5.9%
Capex Intensity
ALB
ALB
TKO
TKO
Q1 26
6.9%
Q4 25
10.9%
Q3 25
10.1%
Q2 25
9.0%
Q1 25
17.0%
Q4 24
28.9%
Q3 24
22.4%
Q2 24
31.3%
Cash Conversion
ALB
ALB
TKO
TKO
Q1 26
1.09×
Q4 25
Q3 25
10.16×
Q2 25
-0.31×
4.03×
Q1 25
13.19×
2.79×
Q4 24
0.01×
1.83×
Q3 24
10.22×
Q2 24
3.90×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ALB
ALB

Segment breakdown not available.

TKO
TKO

World Wrestling Entertainment Segment$359.6M35%
IMG Segment$247.6M24%
Media Rights Production And Content$222.6M21%
Partnerships And Marketing$93.3M9%
Live Events And Hospitality$72.2M7%
Other$29.4M3%
Consumer Products Licensing And Other$13.2M1%

Related Comparisons