vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and TREX CO INC (TREX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $161.1M, roughly 8.9× TREX CO INC). TREX CO INC runs the higher net margin — 1.4% vs -29.0%, a 30.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs -3.9%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $22.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Albemarle Corporation's revenue compounded faster (2.4% CAGR vs -34.3%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
Trex Company, Inc. is a manufacturer of wood-alternative composite decking, residential railing, and other outdoor items made from recycled materials. Its headquarters is in Winchester, Virginia.
ALB vs TREX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $161.1M |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $2.3M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 30.2% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 2.2% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | -3.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | -76.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $161.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $285.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $387.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $340.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $167.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $233.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $376.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $373.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $75.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $60.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $89.1M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 30.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 40.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 40.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 40.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 32.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 39.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 45.4% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 26.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 24.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 23.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 31.9% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 23.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.71 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.56 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $0.80 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $3.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $1.0B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $989.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $910.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $850.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $887.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $894.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $804.1M |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $65.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $22.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | 13.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 26.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 28.45× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $134.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $65.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $196.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $249.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $-154.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $132.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $193.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | $-174.0M |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $142.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $203.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $-233.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $-89.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $54.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $158.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | $-211.8M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 50.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | -68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | -53.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | 42.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | -56.7% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 48.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | 10.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.45× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 3.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | -2.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | -0.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | -1.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
TREX
Segment breakdown not available.