vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALAMO GROUP INC (ALG) and CI&T Inc (CINT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CI&T Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($489.6M vs $373.6M, roughly 1.3× ALAMO GROUP INC). CI&T Inc runs the higher net margin — 8.3% vs 4.2%, a 4.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CI&T Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -3.0%). ALAMO GROUP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($69.9M vs $45.8M).
The Alamo Drafthouse Cinema is an American cinema chain founded in 1997 in Austin, Texas, which is famous for serving dinner and drinks during the film, as well as its strict policy of requiring its audiences to maintain proper cinema-going etiquette. Sony Pictures Experiences acquired the chain in June 2024.
CI&T Inc is a global digital transformation service provider offering end-to-end solutions including custom software development, cloud migration, data analytics, user experience design, and AI integration. It serves clients across retail, financial services, healthcare, manufacturing sectors, with operations spanning the Americas, Europe, and Asia Pacific.
ALG vs CINT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $373.6M | $489.6M |
| Net Profit | $15.5M | $40.6M |
| Gross Margin | 22.7% | 32.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | 13.4% |
| Net Margin | 4.2% | 8.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.0% | 11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -44.8% | 37.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.28 | $0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $373.6M | $489.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $419.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $390.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.3M | $439.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $401.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $425.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $15.5M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.1M | $29.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 22.7% | 32.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.8% | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.28 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.10 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.57 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.64 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.33 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.28 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.35 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.67 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $309.7M | $47.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $190.7M | $122.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $308.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $550.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | 0.40× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $309.7M | $47.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $244.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.3M | $56.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $140.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $190.7M | $122.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $194.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $198.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $201.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $205.5M | $138.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $278.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $306.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $308.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $280.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $979.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $956.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $550.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $526.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.20× | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.32× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.1M | $60.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $69.9M | $45.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.7% | 9.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.84× | 1.49× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $146.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.1M | $60.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.1M | $69.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $69.9M | $45.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $53.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.1M | $58.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.7% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.84× | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.58× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.82× | 2.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.03× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALG
| Wholegood Units | $293.2M | 78% |
| Parts | $61.6M | 16% |
| Other Revenue | $18.9M | 5% |
CINT
Segment breakdown not available.
