vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Align Technology (ALGN) and Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Camping World Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.1× Align Technology). Align Technology runs the higher net margin — 10.8% vs -9.3%, a 20.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Align Technology posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.2% vs -2.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Align Technology's revenue compounded faster (0.6% CAGR vs -7.2%).
Align Technology, Inc., a medical device company, designs, manufactures, and markets Invisalign clear aligners and iTero intraoral scanners and services for orthodontists and general practitioner dentists, and restorative and aesthetic dentistry. It operates in two segments, Clear Aligner; and Scanners and Services. The Clear Aligner segment consists of comprehensive products, including Invisalign comprehensive treatment that addresses the orthodontic needs of teenage patients, such as mandib...
Camping World Holdings, Inc. is an American corporation specializing in selling recreational vehicles (RVs), recreational vehicle parts, and recreational vehicle service. They also sell supplies for camping. The company has its headquarters in Lincolnshire, Illinois. In October 2016 it became a publicly traded company when it raised $251 million in an IPO. Camping World has 202 locations. In addition to its RV dealerships and accessories stores, the company sells goods through phone order and...
ALGN vs CWH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $112.8M | $-109.1M |
| Gross Margin | 70.8% | 28.8% |
| Operating Margin | 13.6% | -4.3% |
| Net Margin | 10.8% | -9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.2% | -2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.0% | -83.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.57 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $995.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $979.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $995.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $977.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $112.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $135.8M | $-109.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.8M | $-40.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.6M | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.2M | $-12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.8M | $-59.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.6M | $9.8M |
| Q1 26 | 70.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 65.3% | 28.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.2% | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.9% | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 69.5% | 30.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 70.0% | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.7% | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.3% | 30.3% |
| Q1 26 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.8% | -4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.5% | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 0.5% |
| Q1 26 | $1.57 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.88 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.78 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.72 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.27 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.40 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.55 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.28 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $215.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.1B | $228.6M |
| Total Assets | $6.3B | $5.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 6.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $215.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $230.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $901.2M | $118.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $873.0M | $20.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $208.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $761.4M | $23.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $228.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $296.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $340.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $310.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | $326.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $151.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $149.7M |
| Q1 26 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1B | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.2B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $5.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.64× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $151.0M | $-227.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.34× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $151.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $223.2M | $-227.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.7M | $139.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $128.7M | $187.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.7M | $-232.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.1M | $-163.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.7M | $324.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.8M | $152.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $187.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $263.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $233.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.33× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 6.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.76× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.27× | 58.93× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.66× | 15.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALGN
| Clear Aligner | $856.0M | 82% |
| CAM Services | $184.1M | 18% |
CWH
| New Vehicles | $457.8M | 39% |
| Used Vehicles | $386.5M | 33% |
| Products Service And Other | $160.5M | 14% |
| Finance And Insurance Net | $111.4M | 9% |
| Good Sam Services And Plans | $48.0M | 4% |
| Good Sam Club | $10.5M | 1% |
