vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aligos Therapeutics, Inc. (ALGS) and ATIF Holdings Ltd (ZBAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ATIF Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($250.0K vs $169.0K, roughly 1.5× Aligos Therapeutics, Inc.). On growth, ATIF Holdings Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.0% vs -72.1%). Over the past eight quarters, ATIF Holdings Ltd's revenue compounded faster (-8.7% CAGR vs -50.7%).
Aligos Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing novel targeted therapies for prevalent liver diseases and viral infections. Its core pipeline includes candidates for chronic hepatitis B, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, and other liver-related disorders, advancing R&D to serve unmet global patient needs.
ATIF Holdings Ltd is a professional business advisory service provider that mainly serves small and medium-sized enterprises across the Asia-Pacific region. It offers corporate strategic consulting, fundraising guidance, cross-border expansion support, and industry resource matching services for clients in technology, consumer goods, manufacturing and other key sectors.
ALGS vs ZBAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $169.0K | $250.0K |
| Net Profit | — | $-1.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -75.6% |
| Net Margin | — | -635.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -72.1% | 25.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 75.8% | -96.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $169.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $965.0K | $250.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.0K | $200.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $606.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | $270.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $200.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $694.0K | $25.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-31.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.1M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-82.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1M | $-807.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-34.9M | $-407.6K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3827.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1924.0% | -75.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6187.5% | -175.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3393.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1610.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2489.5% | -260.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3176.7% | -2190.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4256.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1643.8% | -635.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13854.7% | -951.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13556.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1540.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 477.0% | -403.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5023.5% | -1630.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.04 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.53 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.11 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.10 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.07 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.81 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.58 | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $77.8M | $7.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $53.5M | $8.4M |
| Total Assets | $88.5M | $8.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $77.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.9M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $137.9M | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $74.9M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.5M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $112.7M | $139.2K |
| Q4 25 | $53.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.9M | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $116.4M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-29.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.1M | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.2M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.8M | $506.3K |
| Q4 25 | $88.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $134.7M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.7M | $8.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.8M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $127.9M | $2.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-82.5M | $-939.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-82.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.5M | $-939.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.9M | $-395.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.5M | $-62.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-22.7M | $-212.8K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-213.5K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -854.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.49× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.85× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.