vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (ALH) and BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (BANC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($437.6M vs $286.9M, roughly 1.5× BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC.). BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC. runs the higher net margin — 25.1% vs 7.5%, a 17.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.9% vs 7.9%).
Alliance Laundry Systems LLC is an American provider of commercial laundry systems. The company designs, manufactures, and markets a line of commercial and industrial laundry equipment under various brands in over 100 countries. Among the company's products are washers, drying tumblers and ironers for the coin laundry, multi-housing laundries, institutional laundries and laundries for consumer residences. Alliance Laundry Systems manufactures products under the brands Speed Queen, Primus, Hue...
BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC.BANCEarnings & Financial Report
Banc of California is an American bank with 80 branches in California, as well as locations in Denver, Colorado, and Durham, North Carolina. The bank is headquartered in Los Angeles, California, with about 2,000 employees nationwide including in New York and Chicago. Banc of California offers a broad range of loan and deposit products and services, focusing on providing banking and treasury management services to small-, middle-market, and venture-backed businesses.
ALH vs BANC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $437.6M | $286.9M |
| Net Profit | $32.9M | $72.0M |
| Gross Margin | 37.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 7.5% | 25.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.9% | 7.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 620.3% | 34.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $286.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $458.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $437.6M | $466.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $453.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $440.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $453.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $384.3M | $431.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $492.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $72.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $77.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.9M | $69.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $28.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $53.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $56.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.3M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.39 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $136.2M | $2.2B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-136.4M | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $34.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-136.4M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-284.6M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $34.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $34.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $34.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $33.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $33.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $35.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.42× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $116.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $87.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $255.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $75.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $77.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $46.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $39.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $234.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.0M | $75.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $61.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $64.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $44.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $34.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 51.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.9% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.55× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.29× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALH
| Equipment Product Or Service | $275.7M | 63% |
| Other | $106.8M | 24% |
| Service Parts | $33.1M | 8% |
| Equipment Financing | $12.6M | 3% |
BANC
Segment breakdown not available.
