vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (ALH) and Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($437.6M vs $267.7M, roughly 1.6× Borr Drilling Ltd). Borr Drilling Ltd runs the higher net margin — 13.1% vs 7.5%, a 5.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.9% vs -1.5%).
Alliance Laundry Systems LLC is an American provider of commercial laundry systems. The company designs, manufactures, and markets a line of commercial and industrial laundry equipment under various brands in over 100 countries. Among the company's products are washers, drying tumblers and ironers for the coin laundry, multi-housing laundries, institutional laundries and laundries for consumer residences. Alliance Laundry Systems manufactures products under the brands Speed Queen, Primus, Hue...
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
ALH vs BORR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $437.6M | $267.7M |
| Net Profit | $32.9M | $35.1M |
| Gross Margin | 37.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.5% | 36.0% |
| Net Margin | 7.5% | 13.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.9% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 620.3% | 10.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $437.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $267.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $384.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $271.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $187.5M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $105.3M |
| Q3 25 | $32.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $35.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $31.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $800.0K | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-165.3M |
| Q3 25 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -116.8% |
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -157.0% |
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-1.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $136.2M | $92.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-136.4M | $1.0B |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $136.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $92.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $195.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $29.7M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $281.8M |
| Q3 25 | $-136.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-284.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $999.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $906.2M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $711.5M |
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $3.0B |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 0.40× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $116.8M | $6.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $87.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.55× | 0.18× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-8.5M |
| Q3 25 | $87.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 3.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 3.00× | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALH
| Equipment Product Or Service | $275.7M | 63% |
| Other | $106.8M | 24% |
| Service Parts | $33.1M | 8% |
| Equipment Financing | $12.6M | 3% |
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
