vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (ALH) and Figma, Inc. (FIG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($437.6M vs $274.2M, roughly 1.6× Figma, Inc.). Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs -400.1%, a 407.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Figma, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.0% vs 13.9%). Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($87.0M vs $49.5M).
Alliance Laundry Systems LLC is an American provider of commercial laundry systems. The company designs, manufactures, and markets a line of commercial and industrial laundry equipment under various brands in over 100 countries. Among the company's products are washers, drying tumblers and ironers for the coin laundry, multi-housing laundries, institutional laundries and laundries for consumer residences. Alliance Laundry Systems manufactures products under the brands Speed Queen, Primus, Hue...
Figma is a collaborative web application for interface design, with additional offline features enabled by desktop applications for macOS and Windows. The feature set of Figma focuses on user interface and user experience design, with an emphasis on real-time collaboration, utilizing a variety of vector graphics editor and prototyping tools. The Figma mobile app for Android and iOS allows viewing and interacting with Figma prototypes in real-time on mobile and tablet devices.
ALH vs FIG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $437.6M | $274.2M |
| Net Profit | $32.9M | $-1.1B |
| Gross Margin | 37.0% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 19.5% | -414.6% |
| Net Margin | 7.5% | -400.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.9% | 38.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 620.3% | -6933.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $-2.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $437.6M | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $249.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $384.3M | $198.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $177.2M |
| Q3 25 | $32.9M | $-1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $28.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.3M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-827.9M |
| Q3 25 | 37.0% | 69.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 88.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.2% | 90.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 77.7% |
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | -414.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.7% | -23.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -504.7% |
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | -400.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.6% | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -467.2% |
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $-2.72 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.39 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $136.2M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-136.4M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $136.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.4M | $416.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $586.1M |
| Q3 25 | $-136.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-284.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $862.4M |
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $116.8M | $51.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $87.0M | $49.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.9% | 18.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.8% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $87.0M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 19.9% | 18.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 3.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALH
| Equipment Product Or Service | $275.7M | 63% |
| Other | $106.8M | 24% |
| Service Parts | $33.1M | 8% |
| Equipment Financing | $12.6M | 3% |
FIG
| Non Us | $147.4M | 54% |
| US | $126.8M | 46% |
