vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (ALH) and PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($437.6M vs $349.1M, roughly 1.3× PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.). Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs -10.8%, a 18.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.6% vs 13.9%). PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($109.2M vs $87.0M).
Alliance Laundry Systems LLC is an American provider of commercial laundry systems. The company designs, manufactures, and markets a line of commercial and industrial laundry equipment under various brands in over 100 countries. Among the company's products are washers, drying tumblers and ironers for the coin laundry, multi-housing laundries, institutional laundries and laundries for consumer residences. Alliance Laundry Systems manufactures products under the brands Speed Queen, Primus, Hue...
Procore Technologies is an American construction management software as a service company founded in 2002, with headquarters in Carpinteria, California. Procore hosts a platform to connect those involved in the construction industry on a global platform. The software allows for the creation of simplified workflows and displays a consolidated view of construction products that includes the tracking of tasks, management of project workflows, and scheduling.
ALH vs PCOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $437.6M | $349.1M |
| Net Profit | $32.9M | $-37.6M |
| Gross Margin | 37.0% | 80.1% |
| Operating Margin | 19.5% | -12.3% |
| Net Margin | 7.5% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.9% | 15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 620.3% | 39.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $-0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $349.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $437.6M | $338.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $323.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $302.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $384.3M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $284.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $269.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-37.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.9M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-33.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-62.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.3M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 80.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.0% | 79.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 81.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.2% | 81.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 83.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 83.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.7% | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -7.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.6% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -4.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $136.2M | $768.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-136.4M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $768.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.2M | $684.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $620.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $566.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $775.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.4M | $756.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $735.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $744.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-136.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-284.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $116.8M | $114.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $87.0M | $109.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.9% | 31.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.8% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $282.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $114.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $66.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $58.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $69.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $109.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.0M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $56.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $67.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.9% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALH
| Equipment Product Or Service | $275.7M | 63% |
| Other | $106.8M | 24% |
| Service Parts | $33.1M | 8% |
| Equipment Financing | $12.6M | 3% |
PCOR
| US | $298.3M | 85% |
| Non Us | $50.9M | 15% |
