vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Alkermes plc. (ALKS) and CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP (CWT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Alkermes plc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($384.5M vs $210.7M, roughly 1.8× CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP). Alkermes plc. runs the higher net margin — 12.8% vs 5.4%, a 7.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-3.3% vs -10.6%). Over the past eight quarters, CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP's revenue compounded faster (16.6% CAGR vs 4.8%).
Alkermes plc is a fully-integrated biopharmaceutical company that focuses on developing medicines for psychiatric and neurological disorders. The company was founded in 1987 by Michael Wall. In September 2011 Alkermes, Inc. merged with Elan Drug Technologies (EDT), the former drug formulation and manufacturing division of Élan Corporation, plc. The company is headquartered in Dublin, and has an R&D center in Waltham, Massachusetts, and a manufacturing facility in Wilmington, Ohio.
California Water Service Group (CWSG) is an American public utility company providing drinking water and wastewater services. It is the third-largest investor-owned publicly traded water utility in the United States, serving roughly two million people through its subsidiary companies in California, Hawaii, New Mexico and Washington. CWSG was formed in 1997 as a new holding company for California Water Service to expand into other states regulated by their own public utilities commissions, and...
ALKS vs CWT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $384.5M | $210.7M |
| Net Profit | $49.3M | $11.5M |
| Gross Margin | 88.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.1% | 12.2% |
| Net Margin | 12.8% | 5.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.6% | -3.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -66.3% | -41.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.29 | $0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $384.5M | $210.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $394.2M | $314.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $390.7M | $256.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $306.5M | $182.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $430.0M | $217.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $378.1M | $306.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $399.1M | $226.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $350.4M | $154.9M |
| Q4 25 | $49.3M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.8M | $61.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.1M | $42.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.5M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.5M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.4M | $60.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.4M | $40.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.8M | $69.9M |
| Q4 25 | 88.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 86.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 87.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 83.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 85.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 83.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 84.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 83.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.8% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.8% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.7% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.5% | 21.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 50.3% |
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 19.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.3% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.1% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.4% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.9% | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | 45.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.29 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.49 | $1.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | $0.71 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.13 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.88 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.55 | $1.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.53 | $0.70 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.21 | $1.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $388.6M | $51.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $5.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.87× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.6M | $51.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $616.4M | $76.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.2M | $50.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $399.8M | $44.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $291.1M | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.3M | $59.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $535.1M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $420.8M | $42.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $4.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $170.1M | $47.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $170.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 44.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.45× | 4.17× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $480.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $170.1M | $47.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.7M | $167.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.2M | $48.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.8M | $38.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.4M | $68.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.6M | $101.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.0M | $94.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.1M | $26.5M |
| Q4 25 | $170.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $84.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $180.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 44.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.45× | 4.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.23× | 2.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.72× | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.40× | 2.88× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.30× | 3.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.88× | 1.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | 2.33× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.57× | 0.38× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALKS
| Vivitrol | $124.1M | 32% |
| Aristada And Aristada Initio | $97.2M | 25% |
| LYBALVI | $94.1M | 24% |
| Royalty | $65.7M | 17% |
| Manufacturing Revenue | $3.3M | 1% |
CWT
| Residential | $133.2M | 63% |
| Business | $47.7M | 23% |
| Public Authorities | $13.4M | 6% |
| Industrial | $6.9M | 3% |
| Non Regulated Services | $4.8M | 2% |
| Other Non Regulated Service | $1.2M | 1% |
