vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Alkermes plc. (ALKS) and FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP (FOXF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Alkermes plc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($384.5M vs $376.4M, roughly 1.0× FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP). Alkermes plc. runs the higher net margin — 12.8% vs -0.2%, a 13.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs -10.6%). Alkermes plc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($170.0M vs $-2.5M). Over the past eight quarters, FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP's revenue compounded faster (6.4% CAGR vs 4.8%).

Alkermes plc is a fully-integrated biopharmaceutical company that focuses on developing medicines for psychiatric and neurological disorders. The company was founded in 1987 by Michael Wall. In September 2011 Alkermes, Inc. merged with Elan Drug Technologies (EDT), the former drug formulation and manufacturing division of Élan Corporation, plc. The company is headquartered in Dublin, and has an R&D center in Waltham, Massachusetts, and a manufacturing facility in Wilmington, Ohio.

Fox Factory Holding Corp. is an American company best known for their Fox Racing Shox brand of off-road racing suspension components.

ALKS vs FOXF — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ALKS
ALKS
1.0× larger
ALKS
$384.5M
$376.4M
FOXF
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FOXF
FOXF
+15.4% gap
FOXF
4.8%
-10.6%
ALKS
Higher net margin
ALKS
ALKS
13.0% more per $
ALKS
12.8%
-0.2%
FOXF
More free cash flow
ALKS
ALKS
$172.5M more FCF
ALKS
$170.0M
$-2.5M
FOXF
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FOXF
FOXF
Annualised
FOXF
6.4%
4.8%
ALKS

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
ALKS
ALKS
FOXF
FOXF
Revenue
$384.5M
$376.4M
Net Profit
$49.3M
$-634.0K
Gross Margin
88.0%
30.4%
Operating Margin
15.1%
4.0%
Net Margin
12.8%
-0.2%
Revenue YoY
-10.6%
4.8%
Net Profit YoY
-66.3%
-113.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.29
$-0.02

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ALKS
ALKS
FOXF
FOXF
Q4 25
$384.5M
$376.4M
Q3 25
$394.2M
$374.9M
Q2 25
$390.7M
$355.0M
Q1 25
$306.5M
$352.8M
Q4 24
$430.0M
Q3 24
$378.1M
$359.1M
Q2 24
$399.1M
$348.5M
Q1 24
$350.4M
$333.5M
Net Profit
ALKS
ALKS
FOXF
FOXF
Q4 25
$49.3M
$-634.0K
Q3 25
$82.8M
$2.7M
Q2 25
$87.1M
$-259.7M
Q1 25
$22.5M
$-141.0K
Q4 24
$146.5M
Q3 24
$92.4M
$4.8M
Q2 24
$91.4M
$5.4M
Q1 24
$36.8M
$-3.5M
Gross Margin
ALKS
ALKS
FOXF
FOXF
Q4 25
88.0%
30.4%
Q3 25
86.9%
31.2%
Q2 25
87.3%
30.9%
Q1 25
83.9%
28.9%
Q4 24
85.6%
Q3 24
83.3%
29.9%
Q2 24
84.6%
31.8%
Q1 24
83.3%
30.9%
Operating Margin
ALKS
ALKS
FOXF
FOXF
Q4 25
15.1%
4.0%
Q3 25
22.6%
4.9%
Q2 25
23.8%
-70.6%
Q1 25
4.5%
3.2%
Q4 24
37.8%
Q3 24
27.7%
5.2%
Q2 24
27.5%
5.3%
Q1 24
12.4%
2.7%
Net Margin
ALKS
ALKS
FOXF
FOXF
Q4 25
12.8%
-0.2%
Q3 25
21.0%
0.7%
Q2 25
22.3%
-73.1%
Q1 25
7.3%
-0.0%
Q4 24
34.1%
Q3 24
24.4%
1.3%
Q2 24
22.9%
1.6%
Q1 24
10.5%
-1.0%
EPS (diluted)
ALKS
ALKS
FOXF
FOXF
Q4 25
$0.29
$-0.02
Q3 25
$0.49
$0.07
Q2 25
$0.52
$-6.23
Q1 25
$0.13
$0.00
Q4 24
$0.88
Q3 24
$0.55
$0.11
Q2 24
$0.53
$0.13
Q1 24
$0.21
$-0.08

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ALKS
ALKS
FOXF
FOXF
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$388.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$536.7M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.8B
$956.0M
Total Assets
$2.5B
$2.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.56×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ALKS
ALKS
FOXF
FOXF
Q4 25
$388.6M
Q3 25
$616.4M
Q2 25
$521.2M
Q1 25
$399.8M
$71.7M
Q4 24
$291.1M
Q3 24
$396.3M
Q2 24
$535.1M
Q1 24
$420.8M
Total Debt
ALKS
ALKS
FOXF
FOXF
Q4 25
$536.7M
Q3 25
$541.8M
Q2 25
$546.9M
Q1 25
$552.1M
Q4 24
Q3 24
$558.4M
Q2 24
$564.1M
Q1 24
$370.4M
Stockholders' Equity
ALKS
ALKS
FOXF
FOXF
Q4 25
$1.8B
$956.0M
Q3 25
$1.7B
$958.7M
Q2 25
$1.6B
$939.9M
Q1 25
$1.5B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.5B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.3B
$1.2B
Q1 24
$1.3B
$1.2B
Total Assets
ALKS
ALKS
FOXF
FOXF
Q4 25
$2.5B
$2.0B
Q3 25
$2.3B
$2.0B
Q2 25
$2.3B
$1.9B
Q1 25
$2.1B
$2.2B
Q4 24
$2.1B
Q3 24
$2.2B
$2.3B
Q2 24
$2.2B
$2.3B
Q1 24
$2.1B
$2.2B
Debt / Equity
ALKS
ALKS
FOXF
FOXF
Q4 25
0.56×
Q3 25
0.57×
Q2 25
0.58×
Q1 25
0.46×
Q4 24
Q3 24
0.47×
Q2 24
0.47×
Q1 24
0.31×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ALKS
ALKS
FOXF
FOXF
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$170.1M
$5.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$170.0M
$-2.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
44.2%
-0.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
2.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.45×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$480.3M
$85.4M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ALKS
ALKS
FOXF
FOXF
Q4 25
$170.1M
$5.3M
Q3 25
$101.7M
$36.8M
Q2 25
$150.2M
$680.0K
Q1 25
$98.8M
$81.7M
Q4 24
$190.4M
Q3 24
$81.6M
$14.1M
Q2 24
$146.0M
$26.7M
Q1 24
$21.1M
$9.4M
Free Cash Flow
ALKS
ALKS
FOXF
FOXF
Q4 25
$170.0M
$-2.5M
Q3 25
$84.4M
$24.6M
Q2 25
$137.2M
$-6.5M
Q1 25
$88.7M
$69.8M
Q4 24
$180.6M
Q3 24
$73.3M
$3.2M
Q2 24
$138.9M
$15.4M
Q1 24
$12.8M
$-555.0K
FCF Margin
ALKS
ALKS
FOXF
FOXF
Q4 25
44.2%
-0.7%
Q3 25
21.4%
6.6%
Q2 25
35.1%
-1.8%
Q1 25
28.9%
19.8%
Q4 24
42.0%
Q3 24
19.4%
0.9%
Q2 24
34.8%
4.4%
Q1 24
3.6%
-0.2%
Capex Intensity
ALKS
ALKS
FOXF
FOXF
Q4 25
0.0%
2.1%
Q3 25
4.4%
3.3%
Q2 25
3.3%
2.0%
Q1 25
3.3%
3.4%
Q4 24
2.3%
Q3 24
2.2%
3.0%
Q2 24
1.8%
3.2%
Q1 24
2.4%
3.0%
Cash Conversion
ALKS
ALKS
FOXF
FOXF
Q4 25
3.45×
Q3 25
1.23×
13.41×
Q2 25
1.72×
Q1 25
4.40×
Q4 24
1.30×
Q3 24
0.88×
2.94×
Q2 24
1.60×
4.94×
Q1 24
0.57×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ALKS
ALKS

Vivitrol$124.1M32%
Aristada And Aristada Initio$97.2M25%
LYBALVI$94.1M24%
Royalty$65.7M17%
Manufacturing Revenue$3.3M1%

FOXF
FOXF

Specialty Sports Group$132.7M35%
Powered Vehicles Group$125.9M33%
Aftermarket Applications Group$117.8M31%

Related Comparisons