vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALKAMI TECHNOLOGY, INC. (ALKT) and Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($129.0M vs $126.1M, roughly 1.0× ALKAMI TECHNOLOGY, INC.). Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 1.5% vs -7.9%, a 9.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALKAMI TECHNOLOGY, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.9% vs 13.9%). Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.1M vs $-7.4M). Over the past eight quarters, ALKAMI TECHNOLOGY, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (23.9% CAGR vs 16.6%).
Alkami Technology, Inc. delivers cloud-native digital banking platforms and supporting solutions for US financial institutions. Its offerings include online and mobile banking interfaces, payment processing tools, data analytics modules, and customer engagement functionalities, primarily serving community banks and credit unions to enhance their customers' digital banking experiences.
SLR Consulting is a privately owned international sustainability consultancy with offices in Europe, North America, South America, Australasia, and Africa. In 2019, it reported revenues of £150.8 million. Its purpose is ‘Making Sustainability Happen’, which it achieves through its global team of expert advisors and technicians, who partner with clients to tackle some of the world’s most complex sustainability challenges. Its ultimate owner is Solar Holdings Topco Limited.
ALKT vs BWMN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $126.1M | $129.0M |
| Net Profit | $-10.0M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | 58.6% | 55.0% |
| Operating Margin | 36.9% | 3.2% |
| Net Margin | -7.9% | 1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.9% | 13.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.5% | -66.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $126.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $120.8M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.0M | $126.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $112.1M | $122.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.8M | $112.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.7M | $113.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.9M | $113.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.2M | $104.5M |
| Q1 26 | $-10.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.8M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.6M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.4M | $771.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.3M | $-2.1M |
| Q1 26 | 58.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.2% | 55.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.8% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.6% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.0% | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.3% | 53.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.9% | 52.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.4% | 52.5% |
| Q1 26 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.1% | -1.2% |
| Q1 26 | -7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.0% | -2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.14 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | $0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $0.37 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $40.4M | $11.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $57.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $370.7M | $261.1M |
| Total Assets | $829.3M | $579.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.22× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $40.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.5M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.3M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.4M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.7M | $10.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.4M | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.0M | $11.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.4M | $23.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $57.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $32.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $36.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $38.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $36.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $38.8M |
| Q1 26 | $370.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $362.0M | $261.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $350.1M | $261.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $344.0M | $249.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $244.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | $246.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $338.5M | $243.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $327.2M | $235.6M |
| Q1 26 | $829.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $847.2M | $579.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $835.2M | $510.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $840.4M | $538.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $837.2M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $437.3M | $505.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $422.2M | $497.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $403.9M | $463.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.8M | $9.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-7.4M | $8.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.8% | 6.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.1M | $33.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.6M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.8M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.7M | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0M | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $548.0K | $3.1M |
| Q1 26 | $-7.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.2M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.5M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $760.0K | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.1M | $11.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.7M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | $2.7M |
| Q1 26 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.0% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.81× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
