vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Allstate (ALL) and OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Allstate is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($16.9B vs $490.7M, roughly 34.5× OLYMPIC STEEL INC). Allstate runs the higher net margin — 14.5% vs 0.4%, a 14.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OLYMPIC STEEL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.4% vs 3.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Allstate's revenue compounded faster (3.8% CAGR vs 0.1%).
The Allstate Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, provides property and casualty, and other insurance products in the United States and Canada. The company operates through Allstate Protection; Protection Services; Allstate Health and Benefits; and Run-off Property-Liability segments. The Allstate Protection segment offers private passenger auto and homeowners insurance; specialty auto products, including motorcycle, trailer, motor home, and off-road vehicle insurance; other personal ...
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
ALL vs ZEUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $16.9B | $490.7M |
| Net Profit | $2.5B | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.3% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 14.5% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.0% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 312.4% | -21.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $9.25 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $16.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3B | $490.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6B | $496.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5B | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.5B | $418.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.6B | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.7B | $526.3M |
| Q1 26 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $595.0M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $331.0M | $7.7M |
| Q1 26 | 18.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 1.5% |
| Q1 26 | $9.25 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.24 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.95 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.76 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.11 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.07 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.33 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | $0.66 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $240.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $31.6B | $579.1M |
| Total Assets | $124.0B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.7B | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6B | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5B | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $9.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1B | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | $233.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1B | $235.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.1B | $272.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1B | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1B | $209.2M |
| Q1 26 | $31.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.5B | $579.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.0B | $578.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.1B | $574.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | $573.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.9B | $570.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6B | $569.5M |
| Q1 26 | $124.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $119.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $111.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $113.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.4B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.29× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.34× | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.37× | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.38× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.43× | 0.37× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-12.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -2.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -2.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $-2.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $-11.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.8% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.4% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | -2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.88× | -2.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.89× | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.30× | 19.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.88× | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.69× | 9.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.13× | -0.38× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALL
| Property and casualty insurance premiums | $15.6B | 92% |
| Other revenue | $719.0M | 4% |
| Other | $533.0M | 3% |
| Accident and health insurance premiums and contract charges | $136.0M | 1% |
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |
