vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Allegion (ALLE) and Atmos Energy (ATO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Atmos Energy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.3× Allegion). Atmos Energy runs the higher net margin — 30.0% vs 13.4%, a 16.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Atmos Energy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs 9.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Allegion's revenue compounded faster (3.5% CAGR vs -9.7%).

Allegion plc manufactures and sells mechanical and electronic security products and solutions worldwide. The company offers door closers, controls, and exit devices; locks, locksets, portable locks, and key systems and services; electronic security products and access control systems; time, attendance, and workforce productivity systems; doors and door systems; and other accessories. The company sells its products and solutions to end-users in commercial, institutional, and residential facili...

Atmos Energy Corporation, headquartered in Dallas, Texas, is one of the United States' largest natural-gas-only distributors, serving about three million natural gas distribution customers in over 1,400 communities in nine states from the Blue Ridge Mountains in the East to the Rocky Mountains in the West.

ALLE vs ATO — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ATO
ATO
1.3× larger
ATO
$1.3B
$1.0B
ALLE
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ATO
ATO
+4.4% gap
ATO
14.2%
9.7%
ALLE
Higher net margin
ATO
ATO
16.7% more per $
ATO
30.0%
13.4%
ALLE
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ALLE
ALLE
Annualised
ALLE
3.5%
-9.7%
ATO

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
ALLE
ALLE
ATO
ATO
Revenue
$1.0B
$1.3B
Net Profit
$138.1M
$403.0M
Gross Margin
44.0%
Operating Margin
18.9%
38.3%
Net Margin
13.4%
30.0%
Revenue YoY
9.7%
14.2%
Net Profit YoY
-6.8%
14.5%
EPS (diluted)
$2.44

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ALLE
ALLE
ATO
ATO
Q1 26
$1.0B
Q4 25
$1.0B
$1.3B
Q3 25
$1.1B
$737.5M
Q2 25
$1.0B
$838.8M
Q1 25
$941.9M
$2.0B
Q4 24
$945.6M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$967.1M
$657.9M
Q2 24
$965.6M
$701.5M
Net Profit
ALLE
ALLE
ATO
ATO
Q1 26
$138.1M
Q4 25
$147.5M
$403.0M
Q3 25
$188.4M
$174.9M
Q2 25
$159.7M
$186.4M
Q1 25
$148.2M
$485.6M
Q4 24
$144.1M
$351.9M
Q3 24
$174.2M
$134.0M
Q2 24
$155.4M
$165.6M
Gross Margin
ALLE
ALLE
ATO
ATO
Q1 26
44.0%
Q4 25
44.5%
Q3 25
45.8%
Q2 25
45.6%
Q1 25
44.9%
60.0%
Q4 24
44.1%
80.1%
Q3 24
44.7%
Q2 24
44.4%
Operating Margin
ALLE
ALLE
ATO
ATO
Q1 26
18.9%
Q4 25
20.3%
38.3%
Q3 25
21.8%
29.8%
Q2 25
21.5%
30.1%
Q1 25
20.9%
32.2%
Q4 24
19.5%
39.1%
Q3 24
22.2%
28.1%
Q2 24
21.6%
31.4%
Net Margin
ALLE
ALLE
ATO
ATO
Q1 26
13.4%
Q4 25
14.3%
30.0%
Q3 25
17.6%
23.7%
Q2 25
15.6%
22.2%
Q1 25
15.7%
24.9%
Q4 24
15.2%
29.9%
Q3 24
18.0%
20.4%
Q2 24
16.1%
23.6%
EPS (diluted)
ALLE
ALLE
ATO
ATO
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.70
$2.44
Q3 25
$2.18
$1.04
Q2 25
$1.85
$1.16
Q1 25
$1.71
$3.03
Q4 24
$1.65
$2.23
Q3 24
$1.99
$0.82
Q2 24
$1.77
$1.08

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ALLE
ALLE
ATO
ATO
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$308.9M
$367.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.0B
$9.6B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.1B
$14.3B
Total Assets
$5.3B
$29.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.97×
0.67×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ALLE
ALLE
ATO
ATO
Q1 26
$308.9M
Q4 25
$356.2M
$367.0M
Q3 25
$302.7M
$202.7M
Q2 25
$656.8M
$709.4M
Q1 25
$494.5M
$543.5M
Q4 24
$503.8M
$584.5M
Q3 24
$878.9M
$307.3M
Q2 24
$747.5M
$674.6M
Total Debt
ALLE
ALLE
ATO
ATO
Q1 26
$2.0B
Q4 25
$2.0B
$9.6B
Q3 25
$2.1B
$8.9B
Q2 25
$2.1B
$8.9B
Q1 25
$2.0B
$8.4B
Q4 24
$2.0B
$8.4B
Q3 24
$2.4B
$7.8B
Q2 24
$2.4B
$7.8B
Stockholders' Equity
ALLE
ALLE
ATO
ATO
Q1 26
$2.1B
Q4 25
$2.1B
$14.3B
Q3 25
$1.9B
$13.6B
Q2 25
$1.8B
$13.4B
Q1 25
$1.6B
$13.1B
Q4 24
$1.5B
$12.8B
Q3 24
$1.6B
$12.2B
Q2 24
$1.4B
$12.2B
Total Assets
ALLE
ALLE
ATO
ATO
Q1 26
$5.3B
Q4 25
$5.2B
$29.8B
Q3 25
$5.2B
$28.2B
Q2 25
$4.9B
$27.7B
Q1 25
$4.6B
$27.0B
Q4 24
$4.5B
$26.5B
Q3 24
$5.0B
$25.2B
Q2 24
$4.8B
$24.9B
Debt / Equity
ALLE
ALLE
ATO
ATO
Q1 26
0.97×
Q4 25
0.96×
0.67×
Q3 25
1.07×
0.66×
Q2 25
1.16×
0.67×
Q1 25
1.24×
0.64×
Q4 24
1.33×
0.66×
Q3 24
1.53×
0.64×
Q2 24
1.69×
0.64×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ALLE
ALLE
ATO
ATO
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$101.3M
$308.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-725.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-54.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.0%
77.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.73×
0.76×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-1.6B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ALLE
ALLE
ATO
ATO
Q1 26
$101.3M
Q4 25
$240.1M
$308.1M
Q3 25
$229.5M
$348.1M
Q2 25
$209.7M
$496.4M
Q1 25
$104.5M
$922.9M
Q4 24
$219.0M
$282.0M
Q3 24
$231.9M
$330.7M
Q2 24
$173.0M
$411.2M
Free Cash Flow
ALLE
ALLE
ATO
ATO
Q1 26
Q4 25
$200.5M
$-725.3M
Q3 25
$209.8M
$-615.5M
Q2 25
$192.0M
$-370.6M
Q1 25
$83.4M
$83.3M
Q4 24
$194.9M
$-609.2M
Q3 24
$212.0M
$-477.3M
Q2 24
$152.1M
$-302.4M
FCF Margin
ALLE
ALLE
ATO
ATO
Q1 26
Q4 25
19.4%
-54.0%
Q3 25
19.6%
-83.5%
Q2 25
18.8%
-44.2%
Q1 25
8.9%
4.3%
Q4 24
20.6%
-51.8%
Q3 24
21.9%
-72.5%
Q2 24
15.8%
-43.1%
Capex Intensity
ALLE
ALLE
ATO
ATO
Q1 26
2.0%
Q4 25
3.8%
77.0%
Q3 25
1.8%
130.7%
Q2 25
1.7%
103.4%
Q1 25
2.2%
43.0%
Q4 24
2.5%
75.8%
Q3 24
2.1%
122.8%
Q2 24
2.2%
101.7%
Cash Conversion
ALLE
ALLE
ATO
ATO
Q1 26
0.73×
Q4 25
1.63×
0.76×
Q3 25
1.22×
1.99×
Q2 25
1.31×
2.66×
Q1 25
0.71×
1.90×
Q4 24
1.52×
0.80×
Q3 24
1.33×
2.47×
Q2 24
1.11×
2.48×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ALLE
ALLE

Allegion Americas$809.9M78%
Allegion International$223.7M22%

ATO
ATO

Distribution Segment$1.3B94%
Transportation Revenue$41.5M3%
Other$39.4M3%
Miscellaneous Revenue$2.8M0%

Related Comparisons