vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Almonty Industries Inc. (ALM) and MOVING iMAGE TECHNOLOGIES INC. (MITQ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Almonty Industries Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.3M vs $3.8M, roughly 1.7× MOVING iMAGE TECHNOLOGIES INC.). MOVING iMAGE TECHNOLOGIES INC. runs the higher net margin — -10.2% vs -86.1%, a 75.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Almonty Industries Inc. is an international mining company primarily engaged in the extraction and development of tungsten resources. The company operates in Spain, Portugal, and South Korea and is publicly traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX). The current Chief Executive Officer is Lewis Black.

Silicon Image Inc. was an American fabless semiconductor company based in Hillsboro, Oregon, and active from 1995 to 2015. The company designed circuits for mobile phones, consumer electronics and personal computers (PCs). It also manufactured wireless and wired connectivity products used for high-definition content. The company's semiconductor and IP products were deployed by manufacturers in devices such as smartphones, tablets, digital televisions (DTVs), and other consumer electronics, as...

ALM vs MITQ — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ALM
ALM
1.7× larger
ALM
$6.3M
$3.8M
MITQ
Higher net margin
MITQ
MITQ
75.8% more per $
MITQ
-10.2%
-86.1%
ALM

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
ALM
ALM
MITQ
MITQ
Revenue
$6.3M
$3.8M
Net Profit
$-5.4M
$-388.0K
Gross Margin
30.7%
Operating Margin
-10.8%
Net Margin
-86.1%
-10.2%
Revenue YoY
10.2%
Net Profit YoY
26.4%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.04

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ALM
ALM
MITQ
MITQ
Q4 25
$3.8M
Q3 25
$6.3M
$5.6M
Q2 25
$7.2M
Q1 25
$3.6M
Q4 24
$3.4M
Q3 24
$5.3M
Q2 24
$6.3M
Q1 24
$3.9M
Net Profit
ALM
ALM
MITQ
MITQ
Q4 25
$-388.0K
Q3 25
$-5.4M
$509.0K
Q2 25
$-58.2M
Q1 25
$-240.0K
Q4 24
$-527.0K
Q3 24
$-25.0K
Q2 24
$-416.0K
Q1 24
$-601.0K
Gross Margin
ALM
ALM
MITQ
MITQ
Q4 25
30.7%
Q3 25
30.0%
Q2 25
Q1 25
29.8%
Q4 24
27.2%
Q3 24
26.1%
Q2 24
22.5%
Q1 24
17.4%
Operating Margin
ALM
ALM
MITQ
MITQ
Q4 25
-10.8%
Q3 25
6.3%
Q2 25
Q1 25
-7.6%
Q4 24
-16.3%
Q3 24
-1.3%
Q2 24
-7.3%
Q1 24
-16.7%
Net Margin
ALM
ALM
MITQ
MITQ
Q4 25
-10.2%
Q3 25
-86.1%
9.1%
Q2 25
-809.4%
Q1 25
-6.7%
Q4 24
-15.3%
Q3 24
-0.5%
Q2 24
-6.6%
Q1 24
-15.4%
EPS (diluted)
ALM
ALM
MITQ
MITQ
Q4 25
$-0.04
Q3 25
$0.05
Q2 25
Q1 25
$-0.02
Q4 24
$-0.05
Q3 24
$0.00
Q2 24
$-0.04
Q1 24
$-0.06

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ALM
ALM
MITQ
MITQ
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$5.0M
Total Assets
$9.5M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Stockholders' Equity
ALM
ALM
MITQ
MITQ
Q4 25
$5.0M
Q3 25
$5.4M
Q2 25
Q1 25
$5.0M
Q4 24
$5.2M
Q3 24
$5.7M
Q2 24
$5.7M
Q1 24
$6.3M
Total Assets
ALM
ALM
MITQ
MITQ
Q4 25
$9.5M
Q3 25
$11.3M
Q2 25
Q1 25
$11.2M
Q4 24
$10.0M
Q3 24
$10.7M
Q2 24
$10.5M
Q1 24
$12.7M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ALM
ALM
MITQ
MITQ
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-1.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ALM
ALM
MITQ
MITQ
Q4 25
$-1.6M
Q3 25
$-167.0K
Q2 25
Q1 25
$53.0K
Q4 24
$70.0K
Q3 24
$-32.0K
Q2 24
$-472.0K
Q1 24
$1.0M
Capex Intensity
ALM
ALM
MITQ
MITQ
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
0.0%
Q1 24
0.0%
Cash Conversion
ALM
ALM
MITQ
MITQ
Q4 25
Q3 25
-0.33×
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons