vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) and AVAX ONE TECHNOLOGY LTD. (AVX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aeluma, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3M vs $1.0M, roughly 1.2× AVAX ONE TECHNOLOGY LTD.). Aeluma, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -145.7% vs -1633.6%, a 1487.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Aeluma, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered technology firm focused on the design, development, and production of high-performance optoelectronic components and semiconductor products. Its core offerings include photonic sensors and laser diodes, serving the LiDAR, 5G/6G communication, industrial sensing, and automotive markets across North America and the Asia-Pacific region.
ALMU vs AVX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3M | $1.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.9M | $-16.6M |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -163.6% | -1522.1% |
| Net Margin | -145.7% | -1633.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 36.0% | -480.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $32.17 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | $1.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $525.9K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $452.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $344.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $41.3K |
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | $-16.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-145.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-5.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.2M |
| Q4 25 | 27.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.4% |
| Q4 25 | -163.6% | -1522.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -116.1% | -496.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -328.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -600.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2827.7% |
| Q4 25 | -145.7% | -1633.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -107.8% | -1588.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1783.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -42.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10243.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $32.17 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $-5.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-27.60 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-57.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-83.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $38.6M | $22.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $40.8M | $187.0M |
| Total Assets | $42.6M | $195.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $38.6M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $894.7K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $185.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | $40.8M | $187.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.9M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.3M |
| Q4 25 | $42.6M | $195.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.7M | $16.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-251.0K | $-14.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-282.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -22.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-251.0K | $-14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-815.0K | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-884.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-919.2K |
| Q4 25 | $-282.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -22.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -74.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
