vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) and A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP. (AZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5M vs $1.3M, roughly 1.2× Aeluma, Inc.). A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP. runs the higher net margin — -90.4% vs -145.7%, a 55.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.6% vs -21.1%).
Aeluma, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered technology firm focused on the design, development, and production of high-performance optoelectronic components and semiconductor products. Its core offerings include photonic sensors and laser diodes, serving the LiDAR, 5G/6G communication, industrial sensing, and automotive markets across North America and the Asia-Pacific region.
ALMU vs AZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3M | $1.5M |
| Net Profit | $-1.9M | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 34.0% |
| Operating Margin | -163.6% | -265.9% |
| Net Margin | -145.7% | -90.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.1% | -1.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 36.0% | 60.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-12.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | 27.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.4% | 34.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.4% |
| Q4 25 | -163.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -116.1% | -265.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -585.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -381.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -167.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -272.1% |
| Q4 25 | -145.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -107.8% | -90.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1085.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -342.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -224.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -277.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $38.6M | $43.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $40.8M | $71.3M |
| Total Assets | $42.6M | $81.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $38.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $43.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $28.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $24.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $653.0K |
| Q4 25 | $40.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.9M | $71.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $31.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $31.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-504.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-340.0K |
| Q4 25 | $42.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.7M | $81.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-251.0K | $-4.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-282.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -22.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-251.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-815.0K | $-4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-658.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-282.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -22.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -74.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
