vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) and Draganfly Inc. (DPRO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Draganfly Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7M vs $1.3M, roughly 1.4× Aeluma, Inc.). Aeluma, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -145.7% vs -409.2%, a 263.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Draganfly Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-8.7% vs -21.1%).
Aeluma, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered technology firm focused on the design, development, and production of high-performance optoelectronic components and semiconductor products. Its core offerings include photonic sensors and laser diodes, serving the LiDAR, 5G/6G communication, industrial sensing, and automotive markets across North America and the Asia-Pacific region.
Draganfly Inc. is a technology firm specializing in commercial drone design, manufacturing, and sales, plus supporting software and custom aerial data solutions. It serves public safety, agriculture, industrial inspection, disaster response, and mapping segments, with core North American markets and a global client base.
ALMU vs DPRO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3M | $1.7M |
| Net Profit | $-1.9M | $-7.1M |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 26.6% |
| Operating Margin | -163.6% | — |
| Net Margin | -145.7% | -409.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.1% | -8.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 36.0% | -2.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-6.9M |
| Q4 25 | 27.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 24.6% |
| Q4 25 | -163.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -116.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -145.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -107.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -409.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -363.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $38.6M | $5.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $40.8M | $-2.6M |
| Total Assets | $42.6M | $9.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $38.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | $40.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $8.7M |
| Q4 25 | $42.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-251.0K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-282.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -22.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-251.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-815.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-282.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -22.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -74.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
