vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) and INTRUSION INC (INTZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTRUSION INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5M vs $1.3M, roughly 1.2× Aeluma, Inc.). Aeluma, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -145.7% vs -190.7%, a 45.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTRUSION INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-11.6% vs -21.1%). Aeluma, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-282.0K vs $-549.0K).
Aeluma, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered technology firm focused on the design, development, and production of high-performance optoelectronic components and semiconductor products. Its core offerings include photonic sensors and laser diodes, serving the LiDAR, 5G/6G communication, industrial sensing, and automotive markets across North America and the Asia-Pacific region.
INTRUSION INCINTZEarnings & Financial Report
Intrusion Inc. is a cybersecurity company based in Plano, Texas. It provides cybersecurity solutions, including network intrusion detection and prevention systems.
ALMU vs INTZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3M | $1.5M |
| Net Profit | $-1.9M | $-2.8M |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 74.3% |
| Operating Margin | -163.6% | -192.4% |
| Net Margin | -145.7% | -190.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.1% | -11.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 36.0% | -44.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | 27.8% | 74.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.4% | 76.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 75.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 76.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 80.0% |
| Q4 25 | -163.6% | -192.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -116.1% | -108.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -111.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -117.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -113.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -135.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -139.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -218.6% |
| Q4 25 | -145.7% | -190.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -107.8% | -106.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -109.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -118.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -116.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -136.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -141.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -151.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.53 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.94 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $38.6M | $3.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $40.8M | $7.3M |
| Total Assets | $42.6M | $10.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $38.6M | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $122.0K |
| Q4 25 | $40.8M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.9M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | $42.6M | $10.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.7M | $13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-251.0K | $-531.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-282.0K | $-549.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -22.2% | -37.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-7.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-251.0K | $-531.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-815.0K | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-178.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-282.0K | $-549.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-645.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | -22.2% | -37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -74.0% | -153.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -101.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -117.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -140.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -202.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -104.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.7% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
