vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) and ON Semiconductor (ON). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ON Semiconductor is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $1.3M, roughly 1219.3× Aeluma, Inc.). ON Semiconductor runs the higher net margin — 16.4% vs -145.7%, a 162.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ON Semiconductor posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-10.0% vs -21.1%). ON Semiconductor produced more free cash flow last quarter ($372.4M vs $-282.0K).
Aeluma, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered technology firm focused on the design, development, and production of high-performance optoelectronic components and semiconductor products. Its core offerings include photonic sensors and laser diodes, serving the LiDAR, 5G/6G communication, industrial sensing, and automotive markets across North America and the Asia-Pacific region.
Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. was an American semiconductor company based in San Jose, California. It was founded in 1957 as a division of Fairchild Camera and Instrument by the "traitorous eight" who defected from Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory. It became a pioneer in the manufacturing of transistors and of integrated circuits. Schlumberger bought the firm in 1979 and sold it to National Semiconductor in 1987; Fairchild was spun off as an independent company again in 1997. I...
ALMU vs ON — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3M | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $-1.9M | $255.0M |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 37.9% |
| Operating Margin | -163.6% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | -145.7% | 16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.1% | -10.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 36.0% | -32.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | $255.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-486.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $379.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $401.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $338.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $453.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $562.7M |
| Q4 25 | 27.8% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.4% | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 46.7% |
| Q4 25 | -163.6% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -116.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -39.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 30.3% |
| Q4 25 | -145.7% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -107.8% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 27.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.63 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.93 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.04 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $38.6M | $2.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $40.8M | $7.9B |
| Total Assets | $42.6M | $13.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.43× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $38.6M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | $40.8M | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.9M | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $7.8B |
| Q4 25 | $42.6M | $13.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.7M | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $13.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $13.5B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $13.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.43× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-251.0K | $418.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-282.0K | $372.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -22.2% | 24.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.64× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-251.0K | $418.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-815.0K | $184.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $602.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $579.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $465.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $362.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $498.7M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $611.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-282.0K | $372.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | $106.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $454.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $434.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $293.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $207.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $276.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $257.2M |
| Q4 25 | -22.2% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -74.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 12.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 17.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.09× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALMU
Segment breakdown not available.
ON
| Industrial Segment | $426.3M | 27% |
| Other End Markets Segment | $337.3M | 22% |
| Intelligent Sensing Segments | $284.0M | 18% |
| Direct Customers | $282.4M | 18% |
| Intelligent Sensing Group | $230.0M | 15% |
