vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) and Onfolio Holdings, Inc (ONFO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Onfolio Holdings, Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0M vs $1.3M, roughly 1.6× Aeluma, Inc.). Onfolio Holdings, Inc runs the higher net margin — -27.0% vs -145.7%, a 118.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Onfolio Holdings, Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-20.1% vs -21.1%).
Aeluma, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered technology firm focused on the design, development, and production of high-performance optoelectronic components and semiconductor products. Its core offerings include photonic sensors and laser diodes, serving the LiDAR, 5G/6G communication, industrial sensing, and automotive markets across North America and the Asia-Pacific region.
Onfolio Holdings Inc. acquires, manages and grows a diversified portfolio of small to medium-sized online businesses, including niche content sites, e-commerce stores, and SaaS tools. It operates primarily in North America and Western Europe, focusing on high-margin, sustainable digital assets with stable revenue streams.
ALMU vs ONFO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3M | $2.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.9M | $-547.1K |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 50.0% |
| Operating Margin | -163.6% | -59.1% |
| Net Margin | -145.7% | -27.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.1% | -20.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 36.0% | -69.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | $-547.1K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $-700.7K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-534.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-806.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-323.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-335.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-629.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-477.8K |
| Q4 25 | 27.8% | 50.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.4% | 64.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 61.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 53.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 56.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 63.3% |
| Q4 25 | -163.6% | -59.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -116.1% | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -16.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -43.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -35.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -28.7% |
| Q4 25 | -145.7% | -27.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -107.8% | -25.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -17.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -28.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -36.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -30.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $38.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $40.8M | $2.5M |
| Total Assets | $42.6M | $11.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $38.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $529.8K |
| Q4 25 | $40.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.9M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $42.6M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.7M | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-251.0K | $-397.3K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-282.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -22.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-251.0K | $-397.3K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-815.0K | $34.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-430.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-145.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-471.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $67.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-332.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-431.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-282.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -22.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -74.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALMU
Segment breakdown not available.
ONFO
| B Two B | $1.6M | 81% |
| B Two C | $243.0K | 12% |
| Other | $138.6K | 7% |
