vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) and Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aeluma, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3M vs $1.0M, roughly 1.3× Shattuck Labs, Inc.). Aeluma, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -145.7% vs -1005.6%, a 859.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Aeluma, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-21.1% vs -66.6%). Aeluma, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-282.0K vs $-9.0M).
Aeluma, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered technology firm focused on the design, development, and production of high-performance optoelectronic components and semiconductor products. Its core offerings include photonic sensors and laser diodes, serving the LiDAR, 5G/6G communication, industrial sensing, and automotive markets across North America and the Asia-Pacific region.
Shattuck Labs, Inc.STTKEarnings & Financial Report
Shattuck Labs, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing innovative immunotherapies for cancer and autoimmune diseases. It uses its proprietary Agonist Redirected Checkpoint platform to develop bifunctional fusion proteins, with multiple oncology product candidates in active clinical development stages.
ALMU vs STTK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3M | $1.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.9M | $-10.1M |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -163.6% | -1071.6% |
| Net Margin | -145.7% | -1005.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.1% | -66.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 36.0% | 39.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $714.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-12.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-16.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-18.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-17.7M |
| Q4 25 | 27.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -163.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -116.1% | -1071.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -597.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1427.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1797.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -2654.2% |
| Q4 25 | -145.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -107.8% | -1005.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -556.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1339.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1659.6% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -2477.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.27 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.37 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-0.41 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $38.6M | $42.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $40.8M | $93.2M |
| Total Assets | $42.6M | $100.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $38.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $42.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $50.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $60.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $76.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $125.6M |
| Q4 25 | $40.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.9M | $93.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $67.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $96.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $128.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $144.7M |
| Q4 25 | $42.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.7M | $100.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $64.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $77.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $111.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $128.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $146.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $159.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-251.0K | $-8.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-282.0K | $-9.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -22.2% | -900.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | 7.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-251.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-815.0K | $-8.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-12.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-16.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-16.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-19.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-282.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-16.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-19.4M |
| Q4 25 | -22.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -74.0% | -900.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -537.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -679.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -2722.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 2.4% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
