vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (ALNY) and LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. (LOGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.2× ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.). LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs 17.6%, a 0.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (96.4% vs 6.1%). Over the past eight quarters, ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (33.0% CAGR vs 18.5%).
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is an American biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of RNA interference (RNAi) therapeutics for genetically defined diseases. The company was founded in 2002 and is headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. In 2016, Forbes included the company on its "100 Most Innovative Growth Companies" list.
Logitech International S.A. is a Swiss multinational manufacturer of computer peripherals and software. Headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland, the company has offices throughout Europe, Asia, Oceania, and the Americas. It is a component of the Swiss Market Index, and is listed on the Nasdaq.
ALNY vs LOGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $206.0M | $251.0M |
| Gross Margin | 82.2% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | 23.0% | 20.1% |
| Net Margin | 17.6% | 17.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 96.4% | 6.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 25.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.51 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $773.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $594.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $593.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $500.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.8M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $206.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $186.4M | $251.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $251.1M | $170.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-66.3M | $146.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.5M | $144.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-83.8M | $200.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-111.6M | $145.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.9M | $141.8M |
| Q1 26 | 82.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 75.6% | 43.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 84.2% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 81.6% | 41.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 88.2% | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.7% | 42.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 83.6% | 43.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 89.8% | 42.8% |
| Q1 26 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.7% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.4% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 14.1% |
| Q1 26 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.7% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -14.1% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.3% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.6% | 13.0% |
| Q1 26 | $1.51 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.44 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.84 | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.51 | $0.98 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.44 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.66 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.87 | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | $0.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.7B | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $4.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $966.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $968.5M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $789.2M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $233.9M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $250.6M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.4M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.4M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.1M | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $3.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $480.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $465.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 32.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.91× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $903.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $163.6M | $480.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $325.1M | $228.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.7M | $125.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-118.3M | $129.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-94.7M | $370.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.7M | $166.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $124.2M | $176.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.3M | $465.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $313.0M | $212.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.4M | $108.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-127.3M | $116.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-103.8M | $356.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.5M | $151.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.1M | $161.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | 32.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.1% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.4% | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.5% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.6% | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.88× | 1.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.29× | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALNY
| AMVUTTRA | $889.9M | 76% |
| GIVLAARI | $74.4M | 6% |
| OXLUMO | $51.3M | 4% |
| Royalty revenue | $49.0M | 4% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals | $46.3M | 4% |
| Roche | $35.6M | 3% |
| ONPATTRO | $20.5M | 2% |
LOGI
| Retail Gaming | $482.7M | 34% |
| Retail Keyboards Desktops | $254.6M | 18% |
| Retail Pointing Devices | $241.2M | 17% |
| Retail Video Collaboration | $193.3M | 14% |
| Retail Tablet And Other Accessories | $93.6M | 7% |
| Retail Webcams | $82.3M | 6% |
| Retail Headsets | $45.9M | 3% |
| Other Retail Products | $28.0M | 2% |
