vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Alto Ingredients, Inc. (ALTO) and PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.1M vs $232.0M, roughly 1.5× Alto Ingredients, Inc.). Alto Ingredients, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 9.4% vs -10.8%, a 20.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.6% vs -1.9%). PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($109.2M vs $7.6M). Over the past eight quarters, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. is an American multinational cybersecurity company with headquarters in Santa Clara, California. The core product is a platform that includes advanced firewalls and cloud-based offerings that extend those firewalls to cover other aspects of security. The company serves over 70,000 organizations in over 150 countries, including 85 of the Fortune 100. It is home to the Unit 42 threat research team and hosts the Ignite cybersecurity conference. It is a partner organizati...
Procore Technologies is an American construction management software as a service company founded in 2002, with headquarters in Carpinteria, California. Procore hosts a platform to connect those involved in the construction industry on a global platform. The software allows for the creation of simplified workflows and displays a consolidated view of construction products that includes the tracking of tasks, management of project workflows, and scheduling.
ALTO vs PCOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $232.0M | $349.1M |
| Net Profit | $21.8M | $-37.6M |
| Gross Margin | 6.5% | 80.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | -12.3% |
| Net Margin | 9.4% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.9% | 15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 152.3% | 39.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.28 | $-0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $232.0M | $349.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $241.0M | $338.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $218.4M | $323.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $226.5M | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $236.3M | $302.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $251.8M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $236.5M | $284.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $240.6M | $269.4M |
| Q4 25 | $21.8M | $-37.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.2M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.7M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.7M | $-62.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.1M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.7M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 80.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 79.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.9% | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.8% | 79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.6% | 81.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 81.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 83.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.0% | 83.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.7% | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.0% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -16.6% | -21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.6% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.3% | -7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 9.4% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.0% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.2% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.6% | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.0% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.9% | -4.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.28 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.56 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.17 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $23.4M | $768.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $84.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $245.2M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $388.8M | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.34× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $23.4M | $768.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.5M | $684.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.8M | $620.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.8M | $566.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.5M | $775.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.6M | $756.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.1M | $735.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.3M | $744.6M |
| Q4 25 | $84.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $245.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $222.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $213.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $225.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $265.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $268.7M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $388.8M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.5M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $393.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $402.2M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $401.4M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $417.4M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.5M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $434.6M | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.5M | $114.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.6M | $109.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.3% | 31.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.44× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $8.6M | $282.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.5M | $114.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-848.0K | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.2M | $66.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.8M | $29.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.6M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.7M | $58.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $69.1M |
| Q4 25 | $7.6M | $109.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.2M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.3M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.8M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.1M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.1M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-18.4M | $56.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.2M | $67.1M |
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.8% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.6% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.3% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.8% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.3% | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALTO
| Pekin Campus Production | $105.1M | 45% |
| Total Marketing And Distribution Sales | $57.9M | 25% |
| Marketing And Distributions | $55.6M | 24% |
| Other | $11.2M | 5% |
| Kodiak Carbonic LLC | $2.1M | 1% |
PCOR
| US | $298.3M | 85% |
| Non Us | $50.9M | 15% |
