vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALLURION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (ALUR) and SES AI Corp (SES). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SES AI Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.6M vs $3.6M, roughly 1.3× ALLURION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.). ALLURION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — -167.0% vs -373.5%, a 206.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Robinson Technologies is a Japanese video game developer founded by Seth Robinson. The company produced the BBS door games Legend of the Red Dragon, Planets: The Exploration of Space and Growtopia, an experimental multiplayer creative sandbox created as a collaboration with Hamumu Software, released in 2013 for iOS, Android, Microsoft Windows, and macOS.
SES S.A. is a Luxembourgish communications satellite operator supplying video and data connectivity worldwide to broadcasters, content and internet service providers, mobile and fixed network operators, governments and institutions.
ALUR vs SES — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.6M | $4.6M |
| Net Profit | $-6.0M | $-17.0M |
| Gross Margin | 44.5% | 11.3% |
| Operating Margin | -174.2% | -387.7% |
| Net Margin | -167.0% | -373.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -35.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | 50.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.69 | $-0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.6M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6M | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-6.0M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.9M | $-20.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.3M | $-22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 44.5% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.1% | 51.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 73.9% | 73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.6% | 78.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 76.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 73.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -174.2% | -387.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -362.3% | -262.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -205.7% | -652.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -130.5% | -401.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -306.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -229.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -79.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -121.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -167.0% | -373.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -447.1% | -293.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -276.3% | -642.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -26.9% | -214.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -171.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 162.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -70.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.69 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.53 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.28 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.31 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.22 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.40 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.34 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.96 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.4M | $29.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-77.2M | $214.8M |
| Total Assets | $15.8M | $272.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $29.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.4M | $56.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-77.2M | $214.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-82.9M | $228.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-64.0M | $249.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-69.8M | $269.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-78.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-64.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-70.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-66.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $15.8M | $272.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.1M | $288.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2M | $290.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.4M | $306.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.0M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.3M | $-10.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-11.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -243.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 15.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-61.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-5.3M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.5M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.6M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.5M | $-22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-14.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-11.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -243.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -206.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -329.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -410.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -214.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -79.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -93.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.33× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALUR
| ES | $2.2M | 60% |
| Other | $1.5M | 40% |
SES
Segment breakdown not available.
