vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Antero Midstream Corp (AM) and BADGER METER INC (BMI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Antero Midstream Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($291.1M vs $234.1M, roughly 1.2× BADGER METER INC). Antero Midstream Corp runs the higher net margin — 41.5% vs 14.3%, a 27.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BADGER METER INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.1% vs -7.3%). Antero Midstream Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($186.9M vs $50.8M). Over the past eight quarters, BADGER METER INC's revenue compounded faster (9.2% CAGR vs 3.9%).
Antero Resources Corporation is an American company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Denver, Colorado. The company's reserves are entirely in the Appalachian Basin and are extracted using hydraulic fracturing.
Badger Meter Inc. is a leading global provider of flow measurement and control solutions, serving water utilities, industrial, commercial, and residential customer segments. Its core offerings include smart water meters, IoT-enabled usage monitoring systems, and supporting software that help clients track resource consumption, cut waste, and boost operational efficiency, with key markets spanning North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region.
AM vs BMI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $291.1M | $234.1M |
| Net Profit | $120.7M | $33.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.7% |
| Operating Margin | 60.9% | 18.4% |
| Net Margin | 41.5% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.3% | 14.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.1% | 9.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.25 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $291.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $297.0M | $234.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $294.8M | $222.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $305.5M | $238.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $291.1M | $222.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $287.5M | $205.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $269.9M | $208.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $269.8M | $216.7M |
| Q1 26 | $120.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.9M | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.0M | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.5M | $34.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.7M | $38.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $111.2M | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.7M | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.0M | $33.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 39.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 42.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 40.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.4% |
| Q1 26 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.8% | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.2% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.0% | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.9% | 22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.8% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.2% | 19.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.6% | 19.2% |
| Q1 26 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.3% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.8% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.5% | 17.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.0% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | 15.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.24 | $1.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.26 | $1.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.25 | $1.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.23 | $1.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | $1.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.18 | $1.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $180.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $713.3M |
| Total Assets | $5.9B | $973.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $180.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $180.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $713.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $702.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $677.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $641.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $606.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $591.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $563.1M |
| Q1 26 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.9B | $973.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $978.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $936.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8B | $899.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $816.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $802.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8B | $781.3M |
| Q1 26 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.45× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.50× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $198.9M | $54.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $186.9M | $50.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 64.2% | 21.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.1% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.65× | 1.63× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $169.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $198.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $255.5M | $54.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.8M | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $265.2M | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $198.9M | $33.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $232.7M | $52.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.9M | $45.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $215.8M | $36.4M |
| Q1 26 | $186.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $50.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $48.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $40.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.3M | $42.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $147.2M | $34.1M |
| Q1 26 | 64.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 68.3% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.6% | 15.7% |
| Q1 26 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.4% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1.65× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.92× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.84× | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.13× | 1.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.65× | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.09× | 1.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.51× | 1.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AM
| Gathering and compression–Antero Resources | $238.0M | 82% |
| Other | $52.3M | 18% |
| Water handling–third party | $505.0K | 0% |
| Gathering and compression–third party | $295.0K | 0% |
BMI
| Transferred At Point In Time | $198.6M | 85% |
| Transferred Over Time | $22.1M | 9% |
| Other | $13.4M | 6% |
