vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) and JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC (JHG), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $77.9M, roughly 14.7× Amalgamated Financial Corp.). On growth, JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (61.3% vs 6.5%). JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($320.4M vs $36.3M). Over the past eight quarters, JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC's revenue compounded faster (43.9% CAGR vs 7.0%).
CI Financial is a Canadian investment management company based in Toronto, Ontario. It offers investment management and wealth management services targeted to high net worth retail investors, as well as brokerage and trading services to portfolio managers and institutional investors.
Janus Henderson is a British-American global asset management group headquartered in the City of London, United Kingdom. It offers a range of financial products to individuals, intermediary advisors, and institutional investors globally under the trade name Janus Henderson Investors.
AMAL vs JHG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $77.9M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | — | $403.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 42.7% | 42.7% |
| Net Margin | — | 35.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | 61.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 231.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.88 | $2.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $77.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.4M | $700.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.9M | $633.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.6M | $621.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.1M | $708.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $624.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.2M | $588.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $68.0M | $551.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $403.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.8M | $142.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0M | $149.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0M | $120.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $121.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.9M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.8M | $129.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.2M | $130.1M |
| Q4 25 | 42.7% | 42.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.0% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.6% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.2% | 24.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.2% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 53.0% | 26.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.7% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.6% | 21.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.0% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.6% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.5% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.7% | 22.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.1% | 23.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.88 | $2.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.88 | $0.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.84 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.78 | $0.77 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.90 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.87 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.89 | $0.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $291.2M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $794.5M | $5.1B |
| Total Assets | $8.9B | $8.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $291.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $149.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $155.2M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $794.5M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $775.6M | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $754.0M | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $736.0M | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $707.7M | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $698.2M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $646.0M | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $616.8M | $4.4B |
| Q4 25 | $8.9B | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.7B | $7.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6B | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3B | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.1B | $6.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $37.1M | $322.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.3M | $320.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 46.6% | 28.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 1.1% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | 0.80× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $131.3M | $710.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $37.1M | $322.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | $258.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.9M | $135.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.2M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $247.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.8M | $228.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0M | $223.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.3M | $-5.0M |
| Q4 25 | $36.3M | $320.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.3M | $256.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.2M | $133.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $900.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.3M | $243.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.2M | $225.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.8M | $221.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.1M | $-6.8M |
| Q4 25 | 46.6% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.1% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.2% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | 34.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.8% | 36.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.1% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.6% | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.47× | 1.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.96× | 0.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.37× | 0.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.28× | 8.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.05× | 1.73× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.15× | -0.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMAL
Segment breakdown not available.
JHG
| Investment Advice | $585.2M | 51% |
| Investment Performance | $425.8M | 37% |
| Other | $76.4M | 7% |
