vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and Global Net Lease, Inc. (GNL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Global Net Lease, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($117.0M vs $108.5M, roughly 1.1× AMBARELLA INC). Global Net Lease, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 41.2% vs -13.9%, a 55.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs -15.1%). Over the past eight quarters, AMBARELLA INC's revenue compounded faster (45.0% CAGR vs -11.1%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
Global Net Lease, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that acquires, owns and manages a diversified portfolio of commercial real estate assets under long-term net lease contracts. Its property portfolio spans North America and Europe, covering industrial, office, retail and other key sectors, serving tenants across multiple industries to deliver consistent long-term returns for shareholders.
AMBA vs GNL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $117.0M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | $48.2M |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | 94.7% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | 41.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | -15.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | 838.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $117.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $121.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $124.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | $132.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $137.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $138.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $145.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $147.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | $48.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $-60.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $-24.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $-189.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $-65.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $-35.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.6M | $-23.8M |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | 94.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | -11.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | -21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | 40.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | 42.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | 38.6% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 41.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | -49.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | -19.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | -143.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | -4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | -47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | -24.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | -16.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.51 | $-0.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | $180.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $4.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | $180.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | $165.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | $144.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | $147.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | $159.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | $127.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | $122.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | $131.9M |
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.7M | $8.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $222.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.62× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $222.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $56.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $59.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $299.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $62.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $70.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $92.2M |
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
GNL
| Industrial And Distribution Segment | $56.0M | 48% |
| Office Segment | $30.8M | 26% |
| Single Tenant Retail Segment | $30.2M | 26% |
