vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and Information Services Group Inc. (III). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMBARELLA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($108.5M vs $61.2M, roughly 1.8× Information Services Group Inc.). Information Services Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -13.9%, a 18.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 5.9%). AMBARELLA INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.4M vs $4.3M). Over the past eight quarters, AMBARELLA INC's revenue compounded faster (45.0% CAGR vs -2.4%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
AMBA vs III — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $61.2M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | $2.6M |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | 44.8% |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | 8.4% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | 5.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | -14.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $61.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $62.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $61.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | $59.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $64.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $64.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.6M | $-3.4M |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | 44.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | 39.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.8% | 36.1% |
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | -3.7% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.51 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | $28.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $94.7M |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $211.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | $28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | $28.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | $14.0M |
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | $94.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $94.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | $95.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | $96.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $96.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $95.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | $95.6M |
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $213.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $200.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | $202.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $204.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $227.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $235.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.7M | $234.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $5.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | $4.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | 7.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | $25.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $978.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | $141.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | $1.3M |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
III
Segment breakdown not available.
