vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC (LQDT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($121.2M vs $108.5M, roughly 1.1× AMBARELLA INC). LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC runs the higher net margin — 6.2% vs -13.9%, a 20.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs -0.9%). AMBARELLA INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.4M vs $-2.8M). Over the past eight quarters, AMBARELLA INC's revenue compounded faster (45.0% CAGR vs 15.1%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
Liquidity Services, Inc. is an American e-commerce company providing surplus asset management services through a network of online marketplaces. It serves businesses and government agencies by facilitating the resale of surplus, returned, and end-of-life goods. Founded in 1999 and headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
AMBA vs LQDT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $121.2M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | $7.5M |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | 47.0% |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | 7.7% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | 6.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | -0.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | 28.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $121.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $118.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $119.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | $116.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $122.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $93.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $91.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.6M | $5.7M |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | 47.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | 47.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | 45.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | 40.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | 41.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | 45.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | 52.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.8% | 51.6% |
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | 7.2% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $0.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.51 | $0.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | $11.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $215.3M |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $369.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | $10.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | $6.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | $8.4M |
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | $215.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $203.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $208.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | $196.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | $189.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $182.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $172.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | $163.9M |
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | $369.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $375.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $372.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | $358.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $333.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $346.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $325.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.7M | $303.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $-526.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | $-2.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | -2.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $-526.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $19.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $21.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $34.8M |
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $36.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $17.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | $19.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $19.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | $32.5M |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 30.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | 17.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | -11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | 35.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.45× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.71× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
LQDT
| RSCG | $82.0M | 68% |
| Gov Deals | $22.3M | 18% |
| CAG | $11.5M | 9% |
| Machinio And Software Solutions Corporation | $5.5M | 5% |
