vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and MID PENN BANCORP INC (MPB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMBARELLA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($108.5M vs $62.0M, roughly 1.7× MID PENN BANCORP INC). MID PENN BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 31.4% vs -13.9%, a 45.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMBARELLA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 30.8%). MID PENN BANCORP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($71.8M vs $31.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMBARELLA INC's revenue compounded faster (45.0% CAGR vs 21.1%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
Commerce Bancorp was a Cherry Hill, New Jersey–based bank created in 1973. In 2007, it was purchased by Toronto-Dominion Bank, which merged Commerce into TD Banknorth, the latter of which was rebranded to TD Bank.
AMBA vs MPB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $62.0M |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | $19.4M |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | 43.6% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | 31.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | 30.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | 47.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $0.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $62.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $61.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $54.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | $47.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $47.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $42.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.6M | $12.1M |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | 43.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | 39.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 35.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | 32.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | 34.8% |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | 28.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | 28.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $0.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | $0.71 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | $0.72 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | $0.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $0.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.51 | $0.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $814.1M |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $6.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | $814.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $796.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $775.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | $667.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | $655.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $573.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $559.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | $551.0M |
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.7M | $5.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $80.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | $71.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | 115.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 13.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | $132.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $80.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $29.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $71.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $27.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | $12.1M |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | 115.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 50.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | 18.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 93.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | 40.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | 28.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
MPB
Segment breakdown not available.