vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMBARELLA INC (AMBA) and Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMBARELLA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($108.5M vs $198.0K, roughly 547.7× Quantum Computing Inc.). AMBARELLA INC runs the higher net margin — -13.9% vs -785.9%, a 771.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Quantum Computing Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (219.4% vs 31.2%). AMBARELLA INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.4M vs $-12.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Quantum Computing Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (99.0% CAGR vs 45.0%).
Ambarella, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor design company, focusing on low-power, high-definition (HD) and Ultra HD video compression, image processing, and computer vision processors. Ambarella's products are used in a wide variety of human and computer vision applications, including video security, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), electronic mirror, drive recorder, driver and in-cabin monitoring, autonomous driving, and robotics applications. Ambarella's system on chips ...
Rigetti Computing, Inc. is a Berkeley, California-based developer of superconducting quantum integrated circuits used for quantum computers. Rigetti also develops a cloud platform called Forest that enables programmers to write quantum algorithms.
AMBA vs QUBT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.5M | $198.0K |
| Net Profit | $-15.1M | $-1.6M |
| Gross Margin | 59.6% | -49.5% |
| Operating Margin | -15.0% | -11220.2% |
| Net Margin | -13.9% | -785.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.2% | 219.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.2% | 97.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $198.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $384.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.9M | $61.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $62.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $101.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $183.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.3M | $-36.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.1M | $-51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.9M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.9M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 59.6% | -49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.9% | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | 42.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.6% | 54.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.9% | 31.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.0% | -11220.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.0% | -2709.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.1% | -16673.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.9% | -14375.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.9% | -5384.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.4% | -2878.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | -785.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.9% | 620.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.3% | -59806.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | -82640.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -54.8% | -5618.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.6% | -2838.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.48 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.85 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.93 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.51 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $174.1M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $590.1M | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $751.9M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $174.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | $555.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.3M | $348.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | $78.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $590.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $576.5M | $877.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $572.7M | $396.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.3M | $107.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.6M | $60.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.4M | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $559.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $751.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $898.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.9M | $426.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $153.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.3M | $76.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.7M | $76.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $657.7M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $-11.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.4M | $-12.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.0% | -6147.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 583.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.3M | $-37.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $-8.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | -6147.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | -3000.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | -11683.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | -10709.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | -5040.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.5% | -2782.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 583.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 723.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 1678.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 4622.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 508.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 588.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.67× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBA
| TW | $76.0M | 70% |
| Asia Pacific Other Than Taiwan | $20.2M | 19% |
| North America Other Than United States | $7.4M | 7% |
| Other | $5.0M | 5% |
QUBT
Segment breakdown not available.
