vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) and Boxlight Corp (BOXL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Boxlight Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($29.3M vs $2.8M, roughly 10.6× Ambow Education Holding Ltd.). Ambow Education Holding Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 64.2% vs -21.1%, a 85.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ambow Education Holding Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.3% vs -19.2%).
Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is a China-focused education service provider that offers personalized learning solutions, professional career training programs, and K-12 after-school tutoring services. It partners with educational institutions and enterprises to deliver technology-integrated learning resources for learners of all age groups across mainland China.
Boxlight Corp is a global provider of interactive technology solutions, including interactive flat panel displays, projectors, collaborative software, and classroom technology accessories. It primarily serves K-12 and higher education institutions, as well as corporate and government customers across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific, focusing on enhancing learning and work collaboration efficiency.
AMBO vs BOXL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $29.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-6.2M |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | 29.1% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | -13.4% |
| Net Margin | 64.2% | -21.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.3% | -19.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1343.1% | -102.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-1.88 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $29.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $36.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $37.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $38.8M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $49.7M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-16.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.0K | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-17.7M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-17.8M |
| Q3 25 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | 35.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.6% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 36.3% |
| Q3 25 | — | -13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | -12.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -67.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -9.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -42.8% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -23.4% |
| Q3 25 | — | -21.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | -15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -69.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -19.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -45.5% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -35.7% |
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.88 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $-1.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-87.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.72 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $-0.92 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.76 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-19.01 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-1.90 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | $11.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $36.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.6M | $-19.5M |
| Total Assets | $23.2M | $99.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $18.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | $36.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $39.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $38.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $40.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $38.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $40.2M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $44.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-19.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-12.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $30.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | $99.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $99.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $115.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $142.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.6M | $141.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $142.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $161.8M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $180.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.93× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.23× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 2.40× | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 1.45× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $8.2M |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMBO
Segment breakdown not available.
BOXL
| Products | $27.4M | 93% |
| Services | $2.0M | 7% |
