vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ametek (AME) and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ametek is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.2× Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.). Ametek runs the higher net margin — 19.9% vs 5.9%, a 14.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs 13.4%).
AMETEK, Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate and global designer and manufacturer of electronic instruments and electromechanical devices with headquarters in the United States and over 150 sites worldwide.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
AME vs BEP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $398.6M | $100.0M |
| Gross Margin | 36.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 25.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 19.9% | 5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.4% | 14.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.9% | 213.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.73 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $398.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $371.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $340.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.7M | $-88.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $310.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.73 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.60 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.55 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.52 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.67 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.47 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.45 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.34 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $458.0M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.6B | $33.3B |
| Total Assets | $16.1B | $98.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $458.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $439.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $619.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $399.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $373.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $33.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $28.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | $98.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $73.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $584.3M | $379.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $527.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.47× | 3.79× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $584.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $440.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $359.1M | $379.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $417.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $550.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $487.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $381.4M | $231.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $410.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $527.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $329.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $394.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $498.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $460.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $360.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $382.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 3.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.32× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AME
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.1B | 54% |
| Electronic Instruments Group | $620.1M | 31% |
| Transferred Over Time | $294.6M | 15% |
BEP
Segment breakdown not available.
