vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ametek (AME) and Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. (CWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.3× Ametek). On growth, Ametek posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 11.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Ametek's revenue compounded faster (5.4% CAGR vs 5.3%).
AMETEK, Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate and global designer and manufacturer of electronic instruments and electromechanical devices with headquarters in the United States and over 150 sites worldwide.
Cushman & Wakefield Inc. is an American global commercial real estate and property management services firm. The company's corporate headquarters is located in Chicago, Illinois. It is named after co-founders J. Clydesdale Cushman and Bernard Wakefield.
AME vs CWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $399.4M | — |
| Gross Margin | 37.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 26.7% | 2.3% |
| Net Margin | 20.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 11.3% | 11.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 13.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.74 | $-0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | $399.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $398.6M | $-22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $371.4M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $57.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.8M | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.3M | $112.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $340.2M | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.7M | $13.5M |
| Q1 26 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | 26.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | 3.1% |
| Q1 26 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.9% | -0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | $1.74 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.73 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.60 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.55 | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.52 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.67 | $0.49 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.47 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.45 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $481.3M | $600.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.9B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $16.3B | $7.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $481.3M | $600.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $458.0M | $784.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $439.2M | $634.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $619.7M | $618.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $399.0M | $623.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.0M | $793.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.3M | $775.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.6M | $567.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | $10.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $16.3B | $7.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2B | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9B | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.6B | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $7.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.22× | 1.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-243.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-255.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -10.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $203.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-243.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $584.3M | $257.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $440.9M | $235.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $359.1M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $417.5M | $-162.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $550.0M | $115.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $487.2M | $196.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $381.4M | $21.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-255.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $527.3M | $234.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.0M | $225.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $329.8M | $300.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $394.5M | $-166.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $498.3M | $105.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $460.9M | $186.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $360.0M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | -10.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | -7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.3% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 0.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.19× | 4.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 0.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.19× | -85.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.43× | 5.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | 1.61× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AME
| Electronic Instruments | $1.3B | 66% |
| Electromechanical | $663.9M | 34% |
CWK
| Services | $1.7B | 69% |
| Leasing | $497.7M | 20% |
| Capital markets | $181.6M | 7% |
| Valuation and other | $113.8M | 4% |
