vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ametek (AME) and Janus International Group, Inc. (JBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ametek is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $219.3M, roughly 9.1× Janus International Group, Inc.). Ametek runs the higher net margin — 19.9% vs 6.9%, a 13.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ametek posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.4% vs -4.7%). Ametek produced more free cash flow last quarter ($527.3M vs $8.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Ametek's revenue compounded faster (7.3% CAGR vs -8.8%).
AMETEK, Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate and global designer and manufacturer of electronic instruments and electromechanical devices with headquarters in the United States and over 150 sites worldwide.
Janus Henderson is a British-American global asset management group headquartered in the City of London, United Kingdom. It offers a range of financial products to individuals, intermediary advisors, and institutional investors globally under the trade name Janus Henderson Investors.
AME vs JBI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $219.3M |
| Net Profit | $398.6M | $15.2M |
| Gross Margin | 36.0% | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | 25.3% | 13.4% |
| Net Margin | 19.9% | 6.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.4% | -4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.9% | 28.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.73 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $219.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $228.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $210.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $230.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $230.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $248.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $254.5M |
| Q4 25 | $398.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $371.4M | $15.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.8M | $10.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.3M | $300.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $340.2M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.7M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $310.9M | $30.7M |
| Q4 25 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.3% | 39.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | 38.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.6% | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | 39.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.0% | 43.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.1% | 43.4% |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.3% | 12.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | 20.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.0% | 21.8% |
| Q4 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.9% | 12.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.73 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.60 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.55 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.52 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.67 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.47 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.45 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.34 | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $458.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.6B | $560.8M |
| Total Assets | $16.1B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $458.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $439.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $619.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $399.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.3M | $102.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.6M | $110.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $373.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $560.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $543.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $526.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7B | $518.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6B | $526.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $556.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0B | $535.4M |
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.9B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $584.3M | $15.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $527.3M | $8.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.4% | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.47× | 0.99× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7B | $140.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $584.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $440.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $359.1M | $51.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $417.5M | $48.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $550.0M | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $487.2M | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $381.4M | $31.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $410.2M | $28.6M |
| Q4 25 | $527.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.0M | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $329.8M | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $394.5M | $41.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $498.3M | $45.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $460.9M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $360.0M | $25.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $382.6M | $24.0M |
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.3% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.0% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.19× | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 2.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.19× | 4.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | 171.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.43× | 3.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | 1.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.32× | 0.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AME
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.1B | 54% |
| Electronic Instruments Group | $620.1M | 31% |
| Transferred Over Time | $294.6M | 15% |
JBI
| Self Storage New Construction | $72.3M | 33% |
| Commercial And Others | $65.5M | 30% |
| Self Storage R3 | $54.0M | 25% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $15.5M | 7% |
| Transferred Over Time | $12.8M | 6% |
