vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ametek (AME) and JFB Construction Holdings (JFB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ametek is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $16.0M, roughly 125.2× JFB Construction Holdings). Ametek runs the higher net margin — 19.9% vs -11.7%, a 31.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. Ametek produced more free cash flow last quarter ($527.3M vs $-9.1M).
AMETEK, Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate and global designer and manufacturer of electronic instruments and electromechanical devices with headquarters in the United States and over 150 sites worldwide.
AME vs JFB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $16.0M |
| Net Profit | $398.6M | $-1.9M |
| Gross Margin | 36.0% | 4.3% |
| Operating Margin | 25.3% | -12.7% |
| Net Margin | 19.9% | -11.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.73 | $0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $398.6M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $371.4M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.8M | $30.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $340.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $310.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 36.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.3% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | -12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | -22.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | -67.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.3% | -0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.9% | -11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | -21.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | -64.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.73 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.60 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.55 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.52 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.67 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.47 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.45 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.34 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $458.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.6B | $37.8M |
| Total Assets | $16.1B | $40.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $458.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $439.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $619.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $399.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $373.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $10.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $11.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2B | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9B | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $584.3M | $-9.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $527.3M | $-9.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.4% | -57.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.47× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7B | $-12.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $584.3M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $440.9M | $-719.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $359.1M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $417.5M | $392.8K | ||
| Q4 24 | $550.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $487.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $381.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $410.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $527.3M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.0M | $-730.9K | ||
| Q2 25 | $329.8M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $394.5M | $347.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $498.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $460.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $360.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $382.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | -57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | -14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | -68.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.19× | 12.96× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.32× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AME
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.1B | 54% |
| Electronic Instruments Group | $620.1M | 31% |
| Transferred Over Time | $294.6M | 15% |
JFB
Segment breakdown not available.
